Suggestions(2)
Exact(4)
The following of them are examined as examples: the rate of the unithiol oxidation in vitro, concentration of the thiol compounds in human urine, some hematological indicators (rate of the erythrocytes sedimentation, hemoglobin content).
Table 3 Sample Evaluation Framework database file Project: Acronym Full title Project date: (Start) (End) Programme type: FP5 FP6 (User choice) Programme Acronym: GROWTH SST (User choice) Project type: IP STREP NOE Other (User choice) Indicators Rate the extent to which the project contributed/addressed the indicator Fully Partly Indirectly No Not at all Not relevant 1. … 2.
In China, the 2008 Guideline on Enforcement of Chinese Tuberculosis Control Program describes only two evaluation indicators (rate of completion of health promotion activities, and TB core knowledge of target participants) [ 28].
The relationships between these mode features, mediating variables, and three response quality indicators (rate of missing values, reliability, accuracy) are shown in figure 1 and have been previously described by Tourangeau and colleagues [ 9].
Similar(55)
Based on final round ratings and indicators rated by both panels.
For the 132 indicators rated by both panels and based on consensus criterion 1 and final round ratings, the overall raw agreement was 85.9% (kappa 0.85, 95% CI 0.81-0.88).
Only indicators rated by both panels included here.
Only indicators rated by both panels are included here.
Indicators rated low or not reaching consensus among panellists were discarded.
Brow bulge, facial expression and eye squeeze were consistently the highest three indicators rated for both usefulness and importance.
Indicators rated with a median score of 7 9 and a consensus of more than 75%% were classified as relevant.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com