The results obtained are discussed in the context of a paradigm of gender dimorphism as an indicator of evolution of Homo sapiens.
An excess of radical over conservative substitutions is a significant indicator of evolution of the proteins under positive natural selection [ 11, 12].
Based on our analyses of the transcriptome during mouse and human organogenesis, we wonder if transcriptome regulation may be an indicator of evolution.
As both acceptance and intention are significantly related to a set of common indicators (knowledge of evolution, creationism, and gender), this relationship is possibly masked.
Our regression analyses above have shown that three indicators (knowledge of evolution, creationism, and gender) are significantly related to both ACCEPTANCE and INTENTION scores (see Table 6).
As outlined above, the regression analyses have shown that three indicators (knowledge of evolution, creationism, and gender) are significantly related to both ACCEPTANCE and INTENTION scores (see Table 6).
Different genetic parameters/tests such as Ho, He, LD, HWE are important indicators of origin, evolution and distribution of diversity in the available genepool.
Ranking individual genes by their respective contribution to the total PBS values--a rough indicator of phylogenetic utility--reveals that some genes, such as ND5, CR, ND4, CoxI and 16S, are better indicators of galliform evolution than others (Fig. 3A).
Ranking single genes by their respective contribution to the total PBS values of the genome tree, as a rough indicator of phylogenetic utility, reveals that some genes, such as ND5, ND4, CYTB, ND2, and 16SrRNA are better indicators of Ursidae evolution than are other genes, such as ND3, ND4L, and ND1.
high and very high acceptance can logically be indicators of acceptance of evolution, and Low and very low acceptance can be indicators of rejection of evolution, but the "moderate acceptance" category is problematic.
