Need is great, however, as the populations served by refugee camp health services have generally poorer health indicators than the communities from which the refugees originally came [9].
Despite the plethora of indicators, these compilations have striking similarities in the domains from which the indicators are drawn an unappreciated concordance among the major collections.
Because the indicator in groups A and B is susceptible to chlorination, its presence in tap water may qualitatively indicate ineffective chlorination treatment and/or poor quality of raw water from which the indicator is not completely removed even under normal operating conditions; immediate verification of the operating conditions in the DWTP would therefore be suggested.
These authors stress as well the need for a conceptual framework [ 16], Fig. 1, p.34 from which the appropriate indicators can be drawn and indices can be constructed.
This work aims to validate and increase understanding of the Global Activity Limitation Index (GALI), an activity limitation measure from which the new structural indicator Healthy Life Years is generated.
A US nationally representative survey found that participants received 55% of recommended care in 1998-2000, 6 and the assessing care of vulnerable elders study, from which the quality indicators for the English longitudinal study of ageing originated, also found a summary quality score of 55% for adults aged 65 or more, with worse care for geriatric conditions.
We only describe variables and indicators from which data was drawn to answer the questions of this paper.
This increased granularity and flexibility in the indictors, led to the local development of a basket of quality indicators from which individual universities could select elements most appropriate to their individual circumstances [ 6].
To define the conceptual framework of the study, we identified five indicators from the literature, which allow conclusions on the presence of the two forms of bias/confounding in the included studies (Table 1).> We performed the systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement [ 12].
Denominator = coverage of the indicators from HC/VHV which is considered more reliable.
