From among the available county indicators correlation coefficients imply statistically significant associations of the county specific nursing densities with health spending per capita and immunization rates.
Three indicators, specifically TP, LDL, and Ca, were screened out, as they demonstrated the highest correlations with the other two indicators (correlation coefficients: TP/ALB = 0.936, LDL/CH = 0.968 and Ca/ALB = 0.813).
To analyze the correlations among all pairs of the five typical learning environments, and their sub-level indicators, correlations coefficients were calculated using the nonparametric Spearman rho statistic, and a significance level of P < 0.05 (2-tailed) was applied.
(Does η3A, η3B, or η3C belong in the theory?) Error variance specifications attend to theory consistency, not merely to indicator correlations.
In this way, ( {q}_voverset{sim }{prec } {q}_c ) ■. Theorem 2 The data volume indicator and time correlation indicator are not completely correlated.
The application of the SWDI in an agricultural area of Spain presented good results at both daily and weekly time scales when compared to two climatic water deficit indicators (average correlation coefficient, R, 0.6) and to agricultural production.
This paper uses analytical network process (ANP) method to construct a dispatching model based on the characteristics of all the production facilities on-site (such as the utilization of bottleneck machines), in order to explore the relationship among various performance indicators and correlation between performance indicators and the dispatching rules.
Modeled data and data collected at eight measurement stations located in the NB from February 19 to March 1, 2017, were compared, and three skill assessment indicators, the correlation coefficient (CC), root-mean-square error (RMSE), and skill score (SS), of water velocity and salinity were used to quantitatively validate the model.
Table 7 CLAS statistically significant correlations with Awareness and Perception indicators Spearman correlations Value Approximate significance CLAS * A_R_ University− 0.415 0.028 CLAS * A_R_Your Professors − 0.352 0.066 CLAS * A_UG R_Conferences Dptm.
In the latter case, for valid indicators the correlations should remain at a low level (divergent validity), whereas in the former case they should be at a high level (convergent validity).
For interpretation purposes, the most significant indicators (with correlations over 0.5 and less than −0.5) were assumed as drivers of each component and provided the rationale for the naming conventions and corresponding cardinality according to their influence on social vulnerability.
