Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
The 22 accepted QIs with comments from the panel, the nine potential QIs with disagreement and the new indicator were discussed during the meeting.
The comments of participants regarding the appropriateness and attractiveness of the used images, shapes, header, color, font, text, buttons, menu structure and process indicator were discussed and translated into requirements that were implemented in the prototype.
Similar(58)
Considerations regarding the validity of the indicator are discussed.
The construction of the monitor function based on the error indicator is discussed.
Potential uses of this UV light activated indicator are discussed briefly.
The potential significance of EphB6 to serve as a diagnostic and prognostic indicator is discussed.
The relative statistical indicators were discussed also in view of recently published performance criteria.
Relative to the literature, both novel and familiar indicators were discussed by participant herders (Table 1).
In interdisciplinary team-meetings, all process indicators were discussed, and a well-defined set approved, all being recommended by WHO.
Joint indicators were discussed as an ideal condition for successful programmatic integration by 13 interview participants (54 %).
The advantages and disadvantages of synthetic cohort indicators are discussed.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com