Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Each indicator is rated on a 1 to 5 scale after gathering information from multiple sources.
Similar(58)
In this first round, indicators were rated on only four attributes: link to outcome, reliability, relevance and actionability.
Consequently, the indicator is rated with a red traffic light.
Most indicators were rated highly on link to outcomes, reliability, relevance, actionability and priority but rated more poorly on feasibility of data collection under routine conditions.
None of the 20 key indicators were rated as "green" in its 20 year-plus forecast.
We've got nine questions that can be rated on a scale running from 1 to 10. 1 is low, 10 is high, middle scores are indicators of how the leader leans to one side or another.
Each selected project is rated for each indicator.
After discussing and reassessing the 86 possible indicators, 45 recommendations were rated 'valid': four on prevention, nine on 500 1000 mL blood loss, 12 on >1000 mL blood loss, 14 on >2000 mL blood loss, and six on organization.
Indicators were anonymously rated on a 9-point scale (with 1 denoting not valid and 9 very valid) and only indicators with a median score of 7 or higher were selected as final candidate indicators.
It is therefore of great concern that many development organisations are considered ineffective: for example, half of all multilateral organisations were rated as underperforming on critical organisational effectiveness indicators in 2013 (pdf).
Live coverage is one indicator of how politicians are being rated.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com