Sentence examples for indicative prevalence from inspiring English sources
The phrase "indicative prevalence" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you want to describe the level or extent of something that is suggestive or representative of a particular condition or trend. Example: "The indicative prevalence of the disease in the population suggests a need for increased public health measures."
The indicative prevalence of iPAH was 4.8 cases/100 000 population.
9 Our indicative prevalence of 151 cases per million is higher than the number in these reports.
We calculated a minimum indicative prevalence for all forms of PHT of 326 identified cases/100 000 of the population (groups 1 5).
Our study is therefore the first to document estimated cumulative indicative prevalence for all PHT subtypes from a community-based echocardiography population.
This is a retrospective cohort surveillance study and data on the indicative prevalence of PHT are based on the records of one large specialist centre obtaining the echocardiograms included in this study.
Results from the Women's HPV Indigenous Non-Indigenous Urban RurAustralianWHINURstudyn Australian study of cervical HPV prevalence in women presenting for a Pap test prior to the vaccination program, indicated HPV-16/18 prevalence of 27.5% for women aged 16 21 and 15.5% for women aged 22 26, which were taken as indicative prevalence for the current sexually active non-vaccinated population.
The intercept is an estimate of the proportion of false positives (1 − pooled specificity) and pooled sensitivities can be estimated for indicative prevalences of infected individuals.
Using a community-based observational cohort study, we are the first to show the lowest indicative prevalences of all forms of PHT confirmed by a central echocardiography laboratory in a discrete population, with 326 detected cases/100 000 inhabitants of Armadale, Western Australia.
The rise of migraine over these years is not indicative of increasing prevalence.
This persistent rise is not indicative of increasing prevalence: it follows the collection and assimilation into GBD of ever better data as new population-based studies have slowly filled the large knowledge gaps, which as recently as 2007 related to more than half the world's population [22].
This means that at large evolutionary distances shared positions are not always indicative of the prevalence of ancestral intron positions.
