Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(9)
A total score can range from 0 (indicating no risk for postpartum depression) to 30 (indicating postpartum depression) [ 24].
The output risk score ranges from 0 to 100 with 0 indicating no risk and 100 indicating the highest risk of MACE within 72 h.
The majority of the sample (n = 1657, 86.5%) had a score ≥ 12, indicating no risk of undernutrition, and 258 (13.5%) had a score ≤ 11, indicating risk of undernutrition.
A total of 1481 (77.7%) individuals had a score < 6, indicating no risk of undernutrition, and 426 (22.3%) individuals had a score ≥ 6, indicating risk of undernutrition.
This yielded three categories: a middle one indicating no risk flanked by a lower one indicating lower risk for the outcome and an upper one indicating higher risk.
No single case of high level of SF was identified (SF>200 μg/l for boys and >150 μg/l for girls), indicating no risk of iron overload (WHO, 2004) in the study sample.
Similar(51)
The deterministic method indicated no risk to certain biotic groups (i.e. aquatic plants, fish, molluscs, and algae moss fungi), but did indicate risks to larval insects and crustaceans.
The Metal Pollution Index (MPI) for all the foodstuffs showed a higher value, however the calculated Health Risk Index (HRI) indicated no risk to human health upon consumption of those foodstuffs.
Health risk index (HIR) for all HMs were less than 1, which is may be due to the high level of allowable oral reference dose of the respective metal and this indicate no risk.
Generally, all metal concentrations in plant samples were within the standard range of the limits as given in Tables 7 and 8, which indicate no risk of heavy metals accumulation in the plant samples.
Discussion In patients with severe sepsis or septic shock, the level of blood endocan at ICU admission predicts the occurrence of ARDS: an endocan level <3.5 ng/mL indicates a patient at risk; an endocan level > 5.5 ng/mL indicates no risk of ARDS.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com