Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
indicating for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"indicating for" is not a correct or usable phrase in written English.
You should avoid using it. For example, you cannot say "The report indicated for the doctor's diagnosis". Instead, you would say "The report indicated the doctor's diagnosis".
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Alternative expressions(9)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
60 human-written examples
Bar indicates 20 µm.
Science & Research
Scale bar indicates 1 cm.
Science & Research
Scale bar indicates 2 μm.
Science & Research
Scale bar indicates 60 nm.
Science & Research
Scale bar indicates 50 μm.
Science & Research
Scale bar indicates 500 µm.
Science & Research
The bars indicate 2 mm.
Science & Research
Scale bar indicates 10 μM.
Science & Research
Scale bar indicates 80 nm.
Science & Research
The arrow indicates CD34 immunolabelling.
Science & Research
The bars indicate 10 μm.
Science & Research
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Avoid using the phrase "indicating for". It's grammatically incorrect. Instead, use "indicating" followed by the object or consider alternative phrases like "pointing to" or "suggesting".
Common error
A common mistake is adding a preposition after "indicating" unnecessarily. Remember that "indicating" typically takes a direct object. Instead of saying "indicating for the problem", say "indicating the problem".
Source & Trust
60%
Authority and reliability
1.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "indicating for" is grammatically incorrect, according to Ludwig AI. The correct usage involves using "indicating" followed directly by the object it refers to. The inclusion of "for" creates an ungrammatical construction.
Frequent in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "indicating for" is considered grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI identifies this as an invalid construction. Instead, use "indicating" directly followed by the object, or opt for alternatives such as "pointing to" or "suggesting". Be mindful of the context and choose the most appropriate phrasing for clarity and correctness.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
indicating
Removes the preposition, making it a simple verb form.
suggesting
Uses a different verb with a similar meaning of pointing to something.
pointing to
Replaces "indicating" with a more direct verb and preposition combination.
demonstrating
Employs a stronger verb to show evidence or proof.
showing
Offers a simpler verb to express the act of making something visible or clear.
evidence of
Focuses on providing proof or confirmation.
signs of
Highlights indicators or signals.
proof of
Indicates definitive verification or substantiation.
representing
Expresses the act of standing in place of something else.
confirming
Uses a verb that means establishing the truth or correctness of something.
FAQs
How can I use "indicating" correctly in a sentence?
Use "indicating" followed by a direct object. For example, "The data is "indicating a trend"" is correct, while "The data is indicating for a trend" is not.
What can I say instead of "indicating for"?
You can use alternatives like "indicating", "pointing to", or "suggesting", depending on the context.
Which is correct, "indicating for" or "indicating"?
Indicating is the correct form. "Indicating for" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided.
When should I use "indicating" versus "pointing to"?
"Indicating" is a more formal verb, while "pointing to" is more conversational. Both can be used to show a connection between things, but choose based on the formality of the context.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
60%
Authority and reliability
1.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested