Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The cluster analysis indicates two groups, however, they do not match the resistant/susceptible classification; cluster #1 contained 11 susceptible trees, whereas cluster #2 contained 9 susceptible trees and 20 resistant trees.
Similar(59)
Dendrogram indicates six groups are divided into two branches.
The redundancy analysis (RDA) indicated two groups of factors critical for ant community composition.
Depending on the site, multiple comparisons of size between types seemed to indicate two groups: N and HyN were never significantly different and neither were S and HyS.
Arrows indicate two groups of LacZ-positive cells expressing K5.
Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of the microarray signal intensities indicated two groups of gene expression patterns, one consisting of WT 0.5 dpc, and the second including all remaining groups.
The transcriptome distance between two groups varies between 1.00 and -1.00 with 1.00 indicating the maximum distance between two groups or no overlap in the location of the group in the hyper-plane, 0 indicating two completely overlapping groups and -1.00 indicating two groups where one group is a child of the other group.
The significance mark on each bar indicates significant difference (* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001) compared with the baseline (one-sample two-tailed Student's t-test) or between the indicated two groups (paired two-tailed Student's t-test).
Significant difference (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001) compared with the baseline (one-sample two-tailed Student's t -test) or between the indicated two groups (paired two-tailed Student's t -test).
Bootstrap resampling analysis (n = 1,000) indicated two groups were the mode (91%) for the optimum number, hence the six clusters were consolidated into two major subtypes denoted as L (low methylation; clusters A-C; 28% of cases) and H (high methylation; clusters D-F; 72% of cases).
The four circle indicated four groups and the circle size indicated the pi value.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com