Sentence examples for indicates stabilizing from inspiring English sources

Setting W i,s, W i−j,s equally to be 1 indicates stabilizing Δf i,s and ΔP tie,i−j are of the equal importance.

A spike in the low-gradient, low-density area at negative λ 2 indicates stabilizing interactions like hydrogen bonds, a smaller spike and slightly negative λ 2 is the fingerprint of a weaker stabilizing interaction, and a spike associated with positive λ 2 indicates that no NCI is active.

Three categories of ω are typically considered: i) ω>1 reflects adaptive change or positive selection, ii) ω = 1 implies neutral selection, and iii) ω<1 indicates stabilizing or purifying selection, where nucleic acid substitutions that cause a change in the protein sequence (non-synonymous substitutions) reduce organism fitness and are removed by natural selection.

The coefficient w 2 indicates stabilizing selection if it is negative and indicates disruptive selection if it is positive.

The ratio of nonsynonymous (Ka) to synonymous (Ks) nucleotide substitution rates is an indicator of selective pressures on genes [ 14]: a ratio higher than one indicates genes that are under positive selection pressure to change their sequence, a ratio lower than one indicates stabilizing selection.

Higher rate of carbon content degradation indicates stabilized compost at the end of the composting.

As subcutaneous S. aureus must putrefy its host for transmission, such a trade-off would indicate stabilizing selection on AMP resistance.

Moreover, cross-species comparison of ESCs revealed an overall conservation of miRNA expression patterns, indicating stabilizing selection on miRNA expression in ESCs during evolution.

However, if the relationship between spore number (i.e., fitness) and FB has a nonlinear component, that could indicate stabilizing selection.

Within the inland no predator group, we found P ST < FST for PC1 indicating stabilizing selection on spine length and the opposite trend, namely PST > FST for PC2, suggesting divergent selection in body size in this group (Table 4, Figure 5).

Therefore, Smaller W i,1 and W i−j,2 (all to be 0.1) indicates that stabilizing disturbances in Area 1 is considered to be less important, and therefore lead to smaller value of K 1 (1.36) and l DR1 (3.08), and vice versa.