Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
Unless indicated, samples for analysis were randomly selected from all transgenic lines.
To stain the coverslips, anti-CIITA (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-Lys Ub (Abcam), anti-p44/42 anti-p44/42o Scientific) or anti-ERK1/2 (Proteintech) was added to the indicated saMAPK Thermo Scientific
Staff of leprosy- or TB clinics were excluded.> -wrap-foot> a EC endemic control, BL/LL borderline leprosy/ lepromatous leprosy, TT/BT tuberculoid leprosy/ borderline tuberculoid leprosy, RR reversal reaction (type 1 reaction) b BI bacterial index (mean) cTotal number of recruited individuals is indicated; samples for multiple time points were not always included.
Similar(57)
At the time points indicated, samples were taken for (A ) whole cell analysis of GSH and GSSG levels or (B ) NADPH/NADP+ measurements.
'+' indicates samples treated with Dox/Tam for overexpression/knockout cells, respectively.
Deviation in these cases indicate samples have been compromised, for example, by bacterial contamination or recrystallisation (e.g. Miller and Brigham-Grette, 1989; Preece and Penkman, 2005).
c Photomosaic showing the fault-zone architecture of the Atera fault at Tase. White dots indicate sampling points for mineralogical analyses, white rectangle indicates source of samples for microscopic observation, white dotted boxes indicate positions for photograph images in Fig. 2, and red dotted line indicates the latest slip zone (LSZ).
Yellow numbers indicate sampling spots for elemental analysis (Veronika Koudelková, ITAM) Fig. 19 Spectra from EPMA of coin B. Measurement spots indicated in Fig. 18 (Veronika Koudelková, ITAM).
Large KMO value indicates sample adequacy for factor analysis.
The results of this last factor analysis with varimax rotation showed a Kaiser Meyer Olkin value of 0.933, indicating sample adequacy for factor analysis.
24, 26, 27 Results of the PCA with varimax rotation showed a KMO value of 0.93, indicating sample adequacy for factor analysis.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com