Sentence examples for index of difference from inspiring English sources

The proposed method uses the Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD) as the index of difference in distribution between two groups.

If the ranges of n1 and n2 are 0 ≤ n1 ≤ N − 1 and −M + 1 ≤ n2 ≤ M − 1, the resulting index of difference co-array will achieve full coverage for 0 ≤ k ≤ MN − 1.

Given sample points in the range (−L,L), the largest coprime pair that it could have is M and N subject to MN < L, such that n1 and n2 restricted to the range 0 ≤ n1 ≤ ⌊L/M⌋ and −⌊L/N⌋ ≤ n2 ≤ ⌊L/N⌋, the resulting index of difference co-array k = M n1 − N n2 will achieve full coverage in the range 0 ≤ k ≤ L − 1.

This numeric value provides an index of difference between compatible and incompatible tasks.

DVAT score provides an index of difference between compatible and incompatible tasks (a value close to zero for subjects indicated no DVAT effects of compatibility).

Diaz and Osler[2] defined the fractional difference by the rather natural approach of allowing the index of differencing, in the standard expression for the n th difference, to be any real or complex number.

In [1], Diaz and Osler concluded that the fractional difference by choice is a normal method of letting the index of differences, in the criterion appearance for the nth difference, to be any number (real or complex).

The present indices of difference in verbal and visual memory trajectories would also be congruent with two other observations previously reported in our kindred sample: the distinct predictive pathways for visual and for verbal memory in an analysis of the generational differences [25], and the absence of correlation between the verbal and visual memory measures in the offspring sample [8].

As our sample consists of sub-samples that largely differ in sample size (Table 1), we applied a modified bootstrap procedure to evaluate the precision of the calculated SSD indices and indices of differences in size between morphs (HSD indices).

The area under the curve (AUCVGC) can be considered as a measure or accuracy index of the difference in image quality between the two techniques.

In the calculation of the absorption coefficient, the transmittance was normalized to eliminate the interference fringes due to the small index of refraction difference between the c-Si substrate and the films.