Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Feldman writes: "So the upshot [of my reply to skepticism] is that if we take the [skeptical] argument to be about practical knowledge, it has a remarkable conclusion, but an indefensible premise.
Similar(59)
It rests on a premise that's indefensible, namely that there's constant marginal utility and everybody can measure it.
He lacks any reflective function regarding the arbitrary nature of his premises, and to quote Noble, "make[s] claims that are indefensible...use[s] terms loosely... [and] draw[s] upon cultural images of masculinity and femininity without considering their roots and presumptions".
Morally indefensible.
But the indefensible is still indefensible.
This is indefensible".
Loughner's actions are indefensible.
indefensible discrimination does not continue.
This was indefensible.
This law is indefensible.
The disparity is indefensible.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com