The phrase "indefensible of" is not grammatically correct and is not commonly used in written English.
Instead, the word "indefensible" is usually followed by "to" or "against" to indicate what is being defended against. For example: - That decision is indefensible to me. - The statement made by the public official was indefensible against criticism. Using "indefensible of" could be considered a less clear or nuanced way of expressing these ideas. It is possible that in very specific or contextual situations, "indefensible of" could be used, but it is not a standard or commonly accepted phrase.
Torpedoing a President's nominee for a post in his Administration is the most indefensible of them.
Filibusters of judicial nominees, especially of Supreme Court Justices, are actually the least indefensible of the three.
Legacy preferences in college admissions — the nepotistic advantages given to the children of alumni — are indefensible, of course.
After we have spent months watching the impossible happen, of hearing the defense of the indefensible, of observing American values – one after another – fall like bowling pins, it's time to ask: what has this sometimes maddening, bizarre, gruesome, hilarious, shocking, scary Trump phenomenon been about?
Richard Bowen, another founding member of BWU, brought a tome of evidence of indefensible bundles of unsafe securities to the SEC and FCIC.
To my mind, if we want to resolve this wave of racially-tinged, indefensible killings of civilians growing out of the militarization of the police -- on December 6, Phoenix, Ariz.
Withholding food, medicine and building supplies from the million and a half civilians of Gaza because of the indefensible thuggery of Hamas is collective punishment that is appropriately illegal under the Geneva Conventions.
What universe are we living in?" Another prominent theologian, Rev. Martin Marty of the University of Chicago Divinity School, said he "does not excuse some of the indefensible comments of Wright that have now been bludgeoned into our consciousness to the exclusion of all else.
Their view is that Mr. Djindjic, by making such an issue of Mr. Markovic, is trying to tie Mr. Kostunica to a defense of an indefensible part of the old government.
In her brilliant dissection of this betrayal, Malcolm exposed the "morally indefensible" nature of the work of her journalistic tribe.
He also criticised the "indefensible" length of time families of the victims had had to wait for an inquest to be held.
