incremental price for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "incremental price for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing pricing strategies, particularly in contexts where prices are adjusted gradually or in small amounts. Example: "The company implemented an incremental price for their subscription service to encourage long-term commitments from customers."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

The incremental price for sharing is a mere $6, typically, rather than a $22 fee.

Forbes

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

They must find a large enough portion of the addressable customer pool willing to accept incremental pricing for convenience.

TechCrunch

When you understand how to the pieces to pricing these deals work, you can quickly understand the true "cost" of the debt versus the incremental price your paying for some of the features.

WikiHow

However, Mr. Diop said any incremental price increase should be viewed as a stopgap measure.

The New York Times

"If you're looking at this from the perspective of needing breakthrough, expensive systems for instance carbon capture and storage, or advances in solar energy—I don't think incremental price incentives are going to get you there.

Environmental Health Perspectives

They used a deterministic decision analytic model and reported an estimate of the incremental cost for each additional patient successfully treated with venlafaxine XL (versus diazepam), and an incremental cost for each additional patient in whom a relapse would be avoided at 2000/2001 price levels.

ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research

"The adjustments reflect continuing economic pressures, weaker demand and incremental pricing pressures.

Forbes

With findings from these analyses, we estimate the incremental change in series price for vaccines based on the number of subjects in clinical trials.

Human Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics

Trabectedin resulted to €31 590 (€28 192 using hospital price for trabectedin) incremental cost per additional year of life gained and to €42 633 47 735 (€37 992–42 819) cost per additional QALY gained compared with EST.

Annals of Oncology

The first involves a positive relationship to the potential indicator, examples include an incremental adjustment to the prospective payment price for quality or a penalty related to each patient waiting longer than the clinically acceptable waiting time.

BMC Health Services Research

Results: Trabectedin → EST was associated with 14.0 (95% confidence interval 9.1 19.2) months longer survival, €36 778 higher costs (€32 816 using hospital price for trabectedin) and €31 590 (€28 192) incremental cost per LYG with an EVPI of €3008 €31888) compared with EST.

Annals of Oncology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing pricing strategies, use "incremental price for" to clearly communicate that the price changes are gradual and may be tied to specific usage or feature tiers.

Common error

Avoid using "incremental price for" when referring to the cost of producing one additional unit. "Marginal cost" is the more appropriate term in that context, while "incremental price" refers to a series of progressive price adjustments.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "incremental price for" functions as a noun phrase that specifies the nature of a price adjustment. It describes a pricing strategy involving a gradual increase, as evidenced by the examples provided by Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "incremental price for" is used to describe pricing strategies that involve a gradual increase. Ludwig AI indicates the phrase is grammatically correct. While the term isn't overly common, appearing "rarely" across the available examples, it is used in contexts related to news, media and science. When communicating about pricing models, ensure clarity by using "incremental price for" to specify price changes in small increments rather than referring to a single added cost. Remember to distinguish this from "marginal cost", which refers to the cost of producing an additional unit. The phrase appears in Forbes, TechCrunch, and The New York Times amongst others, and provides a way to discuss a step up pricing model.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

additional cost for

Focuses more on the added expense, rather than a gradual increase.

marginal cost for

Emphasizes the cost of producing one more unit or service.

extra charge for

Highlights a supplementary fee.

increased expense for

Stresses the rise in expenditure.

added fee for

Similar to extra charge, but can be used in a broader range of contexts.

step-up pricing for

Highlights a pricing structure with incremental increases.

phased pricing for

Emphasizes a gradual implementation of prices.

tiered pricing for

Suggests a pricing system with distinct levels and corresponding price points.

gradual pricing for

Emphasizes the pace of pricing changes over time.

variable pricing for

Indicates that prices can fluctuate or change based on certain factors.

FAQs

How can I use "incremental price for" in a sentence?

You can use "incremental price for" to describe a pricing strategy where the price increases gradually based on usage or features. For example: "The company implemented an "incremental price for" their subscription service to encourage long-term commitments from customers."

What's a good alternative to "incremental price for"?

Alternatives to "incremental price for" include "additional cost for", "extra charge for", or "step-up pricing for", depending on the specific context.

What's the difference between "incremental price for" and "marginal cost for"?

"Incremental price for" refers to a gradual increase in price, often associated with different tiers or usage levels, while "marginal cost for" refers to the cost of producing one additional unit of a product or service. They are distinct economic concepts.

Is "incremental price for" commonly used in business?

While not as common as some other pricing terms, "incremental price for" is used in business contexts to describe pricing models that adjust gradually based on customer usage, features accessed, or other defined criteria.