Exact(5)
Multilevel modeling found that individuals with increasing levels of depressive symptoms engaged in more abstract thinking in daily life.
Conversely, the level the QoL decreases with increasing levels of depressive symptoms and poor self-rated health.
In contrast to the finding for females, there was no evidence that increasing levels of depressive symptoms in males was related to harmful alcohol use at 18 years.
An individual who is experiencing increasing levels of depressive symptoms might be more or less inclined to misuse alcohol relative to one who has experienced stable symptoms over the same time period.
We were then able to establish putative causal pathways between distal exposure to family-based childhood adversities, negative emotionality and proximal negative life events, and self-reported depressive symptoms recorded at 14 and 17 years of age, which is within the highest period of risk for increasing levels of depressive symptoms.
Similar(55)
Higher scores indicate increased levels of depressive symptomatology.
Type D personality patients experience increased levels of depressive symptoms [ 24, 25].
Classification of risk was based on increased levels of depressive symptoms and continuity of those symptoms over time.
A recent study based on Canadian WC claims data reported increased levels of depressive symptoms following a work-related musculoskeletal injury, with a prevalence of 42.9% and 26.5% at 1 month and 6 months, respectively [ 9].
CDIs, however, scored significantly higher on all three subscales of the DASS-21, reflecting increased levels of depressive mood (F1,55 = 35.8, p <.001), anxiety (F1,55 = 33.9, p <.001), and stress (F1,55 = 25.0, p <.001).
For adolescent boys (n = 409), as expected from the univariate results, early childhood adversity was significantly related to increased levels of depressive symptoms at age 14 (p <.05) but was only indirectly related to age 17 depressive symptoms through age 14 depressive symptoms (β = 0.49, SE = 0.22, p <.05).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com