Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
increased risk for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"increased risk for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to an increased likelihood of something occurring. For example, "The scientists found an increased risk for heart disease in those with a high-fat diet."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Alternative expressions(4)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
56 human-written examples
Depressed mothers are at increased risk for preeclampsia.
News & Media
And he is at increased risk for infections.
News & Media
The team found a 45percentt increased risk for depressive disorders and a 55percentt increased risk for anxiety disorders among the Parkinson's relatives.
News & Media
Lori said she considered the increased risk for breast cancer, and "It worries me a bit".
News & Media
Several studies have found that gum disease is associated with an increased risk for heart attack.
News & Media
This invokes an increased risk for severe complications.
Science
ICU patients have an increased risk for disturbed sleep.
ICU patients have increased risk for disturbed sleep architecture.
HIV-infected women are at increased risk for cervical dysplasia.
Science
Previous research had suggested an increased risk for weekend admissions.
News & Media
In fact, just a 1% rise in glucose level will lead to an 18% increased risk for cardiovascular events [16], 37% increased risk for renal diseases [11] and 12 14% increased risk for premature mortality [11, 15, 16].
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When discussing health or safety, clearly specify what the "increased risk for" relates to. For instance, instead of just saying "there's an increased risk", state "there's an "increased risk for" heart disease".
Common error
Avoid using "increased risk for" without specifying the condition or outcome. For example, instead of saying "the study showed an increased risk for participants", clarify with "the study showed an "increased risk for" developing diabetes among participants".
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "increased risk for" functions as a prepositional phrase indicating a heightened probability or danger related to a specific condition, outcome, or group. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and commonly used.
Frequent in
Science
46%
News & Media
43%
Formal & Business
2%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "increased risk for" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to denote a heightened probability of a specific negative outcome. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's suitable for various contexts, especially in science and news media. When using this phrase, it is important to be clear about what the "increased risk for" pertains to in order to avoid vagueness. While alternatives like "heightened chance of" or "higher probability of" exist, "increased risk for" remains a direct and widely understood way to convey the concept of elevated danger or susceptibility.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
higher probability of
Replaces "risk" with "probability", providing a more statistical tone.
elevated likelihood of
Replaces "risk" with "likelihood" and "increased" with "elevated" to denote a higher probability of something occurring.
increased odds of
Employs "odds" to convey probability, offering a slightly more informal alternative.
heightened chance of
Substitutes "risk" with "chance" and "increased" with "heightened", indicating a greater possibility.
greater susceptibility to
Focuses on vulnerability rather than direct risk, suggesting increased sensitivity to a particular outcome.
enhanced vulnerability to
Similar to "greater susceptibility", emphasizes the state of being more easily harmed or affected.
aggravated danger of
Highlights the intensified nature of the danger, suggesting a more severe level of risk.
amplified threat of
Uses "threat" instead of "risk", and "amplified" instead of "increased", emphasizing the escalation of the threat.
intensified hazard of
Replaces "risk" with "hazard" and "increased" with "intensified", stressing the heightened severity of the hazard.
growing potential for
Shifts the focus to the potential of a negative outcome, rather than direct risk.
FAQs
How can I use "increased risk for" in a sentence?
Use "increased risk for" to indicate a higher likelihood of experiencing a particular negative outcome. For example, "Smoking leads to an "increased risk for" lung cancer".
What are some alternatives to using "increased risk for"?
You can use alternatives like "heightened chance of", "greater susceptibility to", or "higher probability of depending on the context".
Is it better to say "increased risk of" or "increased risk for"?
Both "increased risk of" and "increased risk for" are acceptable. "Increased risk of" is generally more common, but "increased risk for" is also widely used, particularly when specifying a group or condition at risk.
What factors contribute to an "increased risk for" certain diseases?
Factors that contribute to an "increased risk for" diseases vary but can include genetic predispositions, lifestyle choices, environmental exposures, and pre-existing health conditions.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested