Sentence examples for increased negativity for from inspiring English sources

Visual inspection suggested an increased negativity for yes responses compared to no responses in particular within the control group (see Figure 1 right panel, and Figure 3).

This result overlapped with another result: taken together the Categorisation groups showed an increased negativity for List 1 relative to List 2 items over the midline electrodes, whereas the Recognition groups did not, presumably because whilst both Categorisation groups showed the effect, only the Pre-exposed Recognition group did.

All compound words elicited an MMN response – increased negativity for deviants relative to standards (Fig. 2) – particularly over central locations (Fig. 3).

Here, all three groups showed increased negativity for inverted fearful compared to inverted neutral faces (Z = 1.77, P < 0.038), but not for upright faces (P > 0.1).

Crucially, this effect was modulated by the attractor: an increased negativity was observed for grammatically correct determiners that did not match the gender of the attractor, suggesting that structurally unavailable noun phrases were at least temporarily considered for grammatically correct ellipsis.

Interestingly, Lambrecht et al. (2011) found that probes coming from more lateral positions yielded (strongly) increased negativity, but only for the 45°-angle at the target side.

An increased negativity was found for probes coming from the target location compared with those coming from the mirrored location, but latencies were higher (>300 ms) than those observed by Hink and Hillyard (1976).

The (difference-) Stop-N200 was increased for normal controls compared to pure AD/HD and ODD/CD, but there was just a trend for increased negativity in controls compared to comorbid AD/HD+ODD/CD.

The presence of any one of them resulted in significantly increased negativity.

Increased negativity towards autism on the IRAP predicted similar attitudes on some of the explicit measures and also correlated with increased levels of self-reported psychopathology and professional burnout for the tutors working with children with autism.

This study [17] found an increased negativity after the presentation of the last word pair, and a second negativity after the presentation of the vocalization prompt.