Sentence examples for increase in suppression from inspiring English sources

This was the steep increase in suppression with increasing numbers of consecutive stimuli at suppressive phases, even when stimuli were less precisely timed within the region of the tremor cycle favouring suppression.

In this model, we found up to a 12-fold increase in suppression of tumor growth by local therapy in comparison to systemic administration and reduce retention into off-target organs.

Second, the increase in suppression for the 4 cpd condition when the unequal frequency plaid (Figure 2c) is slanted (leading to an iso-frequency image pattern, Figure 2d) also supports the similarity hypothesis over the salience hypothesis.

Importantly, enhanced reduction in pro-inflammatory cytokines like IFNγ and TNFα upon co-culture with primed BMMSCs could explain the increase in suppression of PHA-induced lymphoproliferation in co-cultures with primed BMMSCs.

This seemingly counterintuitive prediction of an increase in suppression from elevated neural excitability results from models of surround suppression that incorporate contrast dependent feedback excitation to drive lateral inhibition [31], [32].

Therefore, inputs from SOMs may exert a stimulus-specific increase in suppression of excitatory neurons that is selective to the standard and does not generalize to the deviant.

In contrast, mean CVL would reflect the increases in suppression, and has a direct relationship to total community viral load, possibly a more important population marker of potential transmission.

The placebo cough response was best characterized by a non-linear increase in cough suppression up to a maximum reduction of 1.6 coughs from baseline at 4 4.5 h, followed by a non-linear return to baseline.

In addition, the group that received psychoeducation regarding TAF was the only group that did not experience a significant increase in thought suppression from baseline to post-intervention, and was also the only group to experience an increase in both frequency of and belief in low-responsibility thoughts from baseline to follow-up.

As expected, there was an inverse correlation between the increase in virologic suppression from 45% in 2004 to 78% in 2008 (p = 0.006) and both total CVL (p-0.011, shown in Figure 2) and mean (p = 0.013, not shown).

The current paper supports and extends the previous work by showing a far more robust relative increase in surround suppression in the migraine group for the contrast-contrast task, and by demonstrating a specific alteration in the processing of drifting but not static stimuli.