Your English writing platform
Free sign upExact(7)
Tables 4and 5 show standard errors and confidence intervals for coefficient of Tscore_cognitive and odd ratio (based on unit increase in predictor) of the model.
Tables 4 and 5 show standard errors and confidence intervals for coefficient of age and odd ratio (based on unit increase in predictor) of the model.
Tables 4 and 5 show standard errors and confidence intervals for coefficient of UFOV3 and odd ratio (based on unit increase in predictor) of the model.
*Ratios reported for a 5-unit increase in predictor variable; **ratios reported for a 10-unit increase in predictor variable.
Higher T2D polygenic risk significantly predicted self-reported diabetes (odds ratio per standard deviation increase in predictor [ OR] = 1.81, 95% CI [1.40, 2.34], p <.001).
For continuous predictors (Satisfaction), odds ratios show the estimated odds of being in a higher implementation category for every one unit increase in predictor.
Similar(53)
The change in NO2 concentrations per interquartile range increase in predictors for this model (R = 72%, leave-one-out cross-validated R = 65%) are shown in Table 3 [observed vs. predicted plot in Supplemental Material, Figure 2 (doi:10.1289/ehp.0901818)].
For a negative binomial regression coefficient, the difference in the logs of expected counts of the response variable is expected to change by the respective regression coefficient for each unit increase in the predictor, given the other predictor variables in the model are held constant.
Findings are presented as parameter estimates from the mixed effects models, interpretable as the change in the average level of the outcome of interest (conditional on the random effect) for every 1 unit increase in the predictor variable for continuous predictors, or as the difference in the outcome of interest between a level of a predictor and a reference level/group for categorical variables.
(Effect estimates are the relative change in interaction scores for a specified increase in continuous predictor variables or compared to the stated reference group for categorical predictors).
These included parental and infant characteristics, indicators of parental socio-economic status (SES) and maternal pre- and post-natal emotional state (Table 3).> -wrap-foot> (estimatestimares are the relative change in interaction scores for a specified increase in continuous predictor variables or compared to the stated reference group for categorical predictors).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com