Sentence examples for increase in assessment from inspiring English sources

This means that the increase in assessment from $16,000 to $16,800 would be permitted because the increase is only 5percentt.

But if, for example, the market value of the property went from $200,000 to $220,000, the resulting 10percentt increase in assessment -- from $16,000 to $17,600 -- would exceed the 6percentt per-year cap.

Benjamin Barr, from the public health department at Liverpool University, who is the report's principle author, said: "The pattern of increase in mental health problems closely matches the increase in assessment of the work capability assessment".

The remaining $640 will typically be carried over and added to next year's assessment -- along with any new increase in assessment attributable to a further increase in market value -- but next year's assessment is also limited by the 6percentt per year cap as well as by the 20percentt, five-year cap.

So, if the "market value" of a Class 2 building goes from $1 million to $1.1 million in a year, the 45percentt assessment ratio would result in an immediate increase in assessment of $45,000 if no limitations were in place.

Over time, the number of publications per year increased, particularly after 2005, and there was a substantial increase in assessment of health service-related issues.

Local authorities are struggling to cope with a tenfold increase in assessments of mentally vulnerable patients when hospitals or care homes want to deprive them of their liberty.

Calculations made using the city's summary of the preliminary assessment rolls show that for many groups of taxpayers, the cut in rates has been more than offset by the increase in assessments.

Despite substantial improvements in objective health measures, there has not been a commensurate increase in assessments of subjective health.

In Montclair, a revaluation is being conducted for the second time in two years after an assessment this year was struck down in State Superior Court because a judge found that it discriminated against owners of property valued at more than $400,000 by giving them a larger percentage increase in assessments than owners of property valued at less than $400,000.

The increase in assessments is not the result of any decision by the city to raise more money, but simply a reflection of the rising market value of most real estate in a boom that has now faded, and the tendency of the assessment on any building to lag behind its market value when values rise steeply.