Suggestions(5)
Exact(4)
On Saturday, the website VroniPlag Wiki, a loose coalition of volunteers who scour dissertations for plagiarized passages and incorrect citations, published an analysis of German defense minister Ursula von der Leyen's 1990 dissertation on the diagnosis of infections in pregnant women.
►"[T]he website VroniPlag Wiki, a loose coalition of volunteers who scour dissertations for plagiarized passages and incorrect citations, published an analysis of German defense minister Ursula von der Leyen's 1990 dissertation on the diagnosis of infections in pregnant women," Gretchen Vogel wrote later that day at ScienceInsider.
The work had its detractors, with some writers criticising it for "repulsive pedantry" and "overbearing assertions", as well as incorrect citations to works that were later discredited.
The November 2006 Focus article "Fertile Grounds for Inquiry: Environmental Effects on Human Reproduction" [ Environ Health Perspect 114 A644 A649 (2006)] contains two incorrect citations.
Similar(56)
The original, incorrect, citation: (Kirkpatrick and Zang 2011), p.39.
Unfortunately, the original version of this article [ 1] published with an incorrect citation.
Other limitations include the incorrect citation of origin for the authors, and definition of research production.
Other limitations include the incorrect citation of origin for the authors, and the use of impact factors as an indicator of research quality [ 32].
Other limitations include the incorrect or multiple citations of the subject category that was generally used in compilation of the annual Journal Citation Reports® presented in each ISI record.
During the drafting of the original article (Kirkpatrick and Zang 2011), neither author noticed that a citation was incorrect, with only part of the citation given in quotation marks, and the remainder appearing as if it were paraphrased.
If any of the information on your case or on your citation is incorrect or missing, you might have grounds for dismissal.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com