Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(13)
Sitrep notes (thanks to the Godfather I now know the meaning of the term my colleague Richard Vine has been using in his excellent Battlestar Galactica blogs): Number of spits through teeth (the correct way): 6 Number of spits with lips (incorrect): 1 Current status of moustache regulations: banned, as anyone with a moustache could be an iraqi infiltrator.
Table 1 McNemar tabulations for the access and return cannulae positioning (ICE versus iCATHe) Access cannula ICE Correct Incorrect Total iCATHe Correct 17 1 18 Incorrect 1 1 2 Total 18 2 20 Return cannula ICE Correct Incorrect Total iCATHe Correct 2 14 16 Incorrect 1 3 4 Total 3 17 20 Figure 6 ICE versus iCATHe results for the access cannula.
The scores from the pretest and posttest were graded as (0) incorrect (1) correct for multiple-choice questions 1 to 8. Question 9 was scored as (0) incorrect or no answer, (1) partially correct if the student was able to represent the forces inside or outside of the ring charge, or (2) correct if students properly draw forces inside and outside of the ring charge.
Variables for each drug were dichotomized as correct (0) or incorrect (1).
28– 31 Variables were dichotomized as correct (0) or incorrect (1).
Answers were scored 0 (don't know, incorrect), 1 (partially correct), or 2 (fully and explicitly correct), forming the dependent variable.
Similar(47)
6. a. (Correct: 36 percent; incorrect: 63 percent).
It rolled out the door with a sticker price of $3,273 and an environmentally incorrect 516-horsepower engine (up from an awesome 425 for unmodified Hemis).
In its own way, every bit as stylistically sensual as the vanished CTS coupe and its politically incorrect 550-horsepower V-8.
(a) Actual Correct Incorrect Predicted Correct 80.8% 3.0% Incorrect 9.2%7.0%% (b) Actual Correct Incorrect Predicted Correct — 8.3% Incorrect — 91.7% (c) Actual Correct Incorrect Predicted Correct 40.4% 5.6% Incorrect 4.6%49.4%%.
Results and conclusion: Seven out of 510 qualitative results obtained were incorrect (1.4%), two false negative and five false positive.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com