The phrase "inconsistent language" is correct and can be used in written English.
It refers to language that is contradictory or conflicting within a sentence or passage. It is often used when discussing errors or mistakes in language or when analyzing the effectiveness of written or spoken communication. Example: The author's use of inconsistent language weakens the argument of the essay, as the terms "equality" and "equity" are used interchangeably throughout the text, causing confusion for the reader.
People close to the discussion said that determination was affected by inconsistent language between the two statutes.
This intersubjective or objective constraint provides a normative, even if conventional, distinction between consistent and inconsistent language use, or between correct and incorrect rule following.
Millions of chemical reactions have been studied, illuminated by our current understanding of molecular structure, but this information is stored in inconsistent language and often bound by publishers' license conditions.
Though Tarski himself seemed to suggest something along these lines (for natural languages, specifically), it was argued by Herzberger (1967) that it is impossible to have an inconsistent language.
In Norway, for example, the commission on prioritisation in 1987 stipulated that "health care should offer everyone the same opportunity to optimize their health potential," 8 but this does not specifically deal with rare conditions and is potentially inconsistent with language requiring consideration of costs in the Norwegian Patients' Rights Act of 1999.
This article was amended on 1 May 2016 to remove language inconsistent with Guardian editorial guidelines.
This story was amended on 11 April 2014 to remove language inconsistent with Guardian editorial guidelines.
This article has been amended to correct language inconsistent with Guardian editorial guidelines.
This option is "inconsistent with the language and intent" of the law, Ms. Sebelius said.
This footnote was added on 7 November 2011 to include links to an apology by Deborah Orr for the use of language inconsistent with Guardian guidelines and an Open Door column by the Readers' editor on the use of such language.
Inconsistent usage of language impedes scientific progress and the utility of scientific concepts in management and conservation.
