Sentence examples for inconsistent evaluations from inspiring English sources

But it is the idea that violation of the probability axioms involves inconsistent evaluations that supports retention of the probabilist's thesis that they are norms of rationality, despite recognition that violating the axioms is not necessarily a pragmatic defect.

For example, if an instrument has low interrater reliability and high intrarater reliability it may mean that the raters have been trained inadequately, resulting in inconsistent evaluations [ 38].

A higher percentage of inconsistent evaluations on one scale with respect to the other indicates that the former is less adequate for pain exacerbation measurement.

NRS revealed higher discriminatory capability than VRS in distinguishing between background and peak pain intensity with a lower proportion of patients giving inconsistent evaluations (14% vs. 25%).

In addition, leaving the organization of the review bodies to the individual member states leads to large inter-country differences and subsequent inconsistent evaluations (reviewed in [ 49]).

The difference between the percentage of inconsistent evaluations obtained through NRS and through VRS, along with its 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI), was estimated to compare the two scales.

E-commerce website evaluation is recognized as a complex multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem involving vast amounts of imprecise and inconsistent evaluation data.

However, the focus of each parameter may be different and sometimes it leads to repeatable evaluation or inconsistent evaluation.

The current diversity of neurological endpoint definitions and ascertainment methods in clinical trials has led to uncertainties in the neurological risk attributable to cardiovascular procedures and inconsistent evaluation of therapies intended to prevent or mitigate neurological injury.

One reason why an ideal doxastic agent's degrees of belief should obey the probability calculus is that otherwise she is vulnerable to a Dutch Book (standard version) or an inconsistent evaluation of the fairness of bets (depragmatized version).

Such inconsistent evaluation results can directly influence the outcome of a hazard or risk assessment for a specific chemical, which in turn may result e.g., in unnecessary risk mitigation measures, or underestimated risks for the environment.