Sentence examples for inconsistency of reported from inspiring English sources

Barrows (1996) claimed that the inconsistency of reported results was due to the different forms of PBL being implemented and perhaps the measurement tools, which was reiterated by Walker and Leary (2009), and that improvement is evident if PBL is implemented in its traditional form.

Such differences in epidemiology between the two forms may explain the apparent inconsistency of reported associations between vascular calcification and risk factors, but further research is required to clarify this.

Due to lack of data and inconsistency of reported adverse events across the included studies, the meta-analysis to assess the association of vortioxetine with specific adverse events was restricted to two variables (nausea and hyperhidrosis).

However, this may be an underestimate in view of the inconsistency of reporting these symptoms.

This discrepancy may be due to inconsistency of reporting data from the Rotterdam I study.

However, the GRADE analysis of the quality of included studies across all domains showed that the strength of evidence for complications and length of hospital stay was "moderate," whereas the strength of evidence for risk of complicated appendicitis was "low" (table 3) owing to the presence of bias and inconsistency of reporting across outcomes.

In this way, gaps in evidence or inconsistencies of reporting can be readily identified.

Inconsistency of reports is probably due to different selection criteria for ALS patients that were in different phases of the disease.

There is some inconsistency of reporting; the authors' narrative summary states that being female is a predictor of greater disability at discharge, yet the statistical presentation of results suggests the opposite; that being female is a predictor of lower DASH score (i.e. better function) at discharge.

This approach has led to ambiguity in measurements that may underlie the inconsistency of conclusions reported in pedobarographical studies.

One limitation of this literature review is that a meta-analysis was not performed due to inconsistency of the reported outcomes [ 60].