Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(4)
Moreover, incorrect or incomplete intake could result in failure to treat the infection and potential recurrence.
Certain incomplete intake or certain non-adherence: Any patient that showed blister packaging still containing any ASAQ pills was certain to have taken an incomplete treatment.
Probable incomplete intake or probable non-adherence: According to the patient/caretaker's account, all pills were not taken so this patient was probably non-adherent.
Thirtyfive (32.4%) patients were defined as probably non-adherent after describing an incomplete intake (including eight patients that took ASAQ pills on Day 3) and 67 (62.0%) patients were described as probably adherent after describing a complete and correct intake (Table 5).
Similar(55)
Also excluded were women with incomplete dietary intake information (n = 372) and those who reported extreme levels of daily energy intake (<500 [ n = 24] or >3,500 [ n = 43] calories per day).
The main reason for pills remaining (incomplete treatment intake) were forgetting to give/take the treatment and patient didn't feel better/treatment wasn't working + felt unwell (2, 33.3% respectively) (Table 6).
Taken together the most common reason patients gave for incomplete and/or incorrect intake was that they were vomiting or felt unwell (10 patients (24.4%)).
Data on dietary intake were incomplete for 31 of these, resulting in 924 (88.4%) children for the present analysis.
Notably, compensation for calories from scheduled access was incomplete since total caloric intake was increased during adaptation and habituation phases (Fig. 1C) (SNK, P < 0.001 versus baseline).
Assessment of soy intake was incomplete in two other cohort studies (Key et al, 1999; Nishio et al, 2007) and they were not included in our meta-analysis.
We excluded the remaining six twoo cohort, four case control) studies from the meta-analysis due to incomplete assessment of soy intake in those studies.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com