Now, with ubiquitous internet and multi-million pound markerting campaigns behind games like Black Ops 3, games companies would rather get the incomplete game out on time rather than wait, as it's fairly easy to send patches to customers after launch.
Way to sell me an incomplete game".
This is relevant because, what, Ubisoft sold me (and all of you!) an incomplete game?
Figure 7 Shows the channel efficiency of "Normal MAC", "Incomplete Game" and "IB Based MAC". Figure 8 shows the average medium access delay performances of NM, Incomplete Game and IBM.
Figure 9 illustrates the impact of CW on energy efficiency of NM, incomplete game, and IBM schemes.
In this subsection we present, the performance comparison of incomplete cooperative game; that is, "Incomplete Game", our "considered" or "normal" MAC protocol, and IB-based MAC protocol in terms of channel efficiency, medium access delay, and energy-efficiency.
In case of "Incomplete Game", we assume that each node estimates the game state timely and accurately by detecting the channel.
For "Incomplete Game" channel efficiency almost keep constant after 30 nodes, as each node can adapt to the variable game state and choose corresponding equilibrium strategy.
Here it is worth to note that during the "Incomplete Game" all the nodes will switch to sleep mode when there is no communication.
Similarly, "Incomplete Game" can also give the comparative performance to IBM, as it also reduces collision by adjusting its equilibrium strategy.
