Sentence examples for incompatible priorities from inspiring English sources

K Street has also helped to cement the alliance between economic and social conservatives, who have different (and, in some cases, potentially incompatible) priorities.

Whether because of national pride, incompatible priorities or the desire to prop up domestic industries, European defence spending is fragmented and duplicative.

The urgent needs and priorities in such projects should be clearly defined and agreed upon between major partners ahead the start of project in order to avoid delays and setting incompatible priorities during project implementation.

Although it emerges from research that physicians are generally willing to admit their mistakes to patients and family, this does not always happen in practice because of the widely diverging and incompatible priorities of the parties involved [ 15- 20].

They promote a strong integrated vision around obesity prevention, help the current government recognize the problem, are active in overcoming incompatible policy priorities in other sectors, and are active when a window of opportunity opens.

One cause was the presence of established structural boundaries, which lead to competing priorities, incompatible IT systems and infrastructure, and poor cooperation.

15 The pharmacists and nurses we interviewed conceivably use professional judgements drawn from a body of experience in cancer care, which ranged from 8 months to 20 years; however, we know that these assessments can be incompatible with patient information priorities and information preferences cannot be simply distilled through a uniform cultural characteristic.

We found that one key contributor to the absence of widespread systematic reuse in this firm was a perception among project teams that reuse was incompatible with prevailing project team priorities and incentives, such as to complete projects on time and within budget.

The HsW model is therefore incompatible with the fragmented approach to priority setting across multiple program budgets that currently characterises allocation in many health systems.

While this distinction between substantive and procedural approaches to priority setting suggests that the two are incompatible, there is increasing consensus on the need to combine these approaches (Ham and Coulter 2000; Ruger 2004; Kamm 2005).

A statutory amendment which gave actual priority to freedom of expression in certain situations would be incompatible with Convention rights and would be likely to constitute a violation of Article 8 when applied in specific cases.