Sentence examples for income function from inspiring English sources

Table 5 depicts the results of the income function estimated by OLS.

We start by assuming that the residual of this income function for a refugee living where he or she has been placed is uncorrelated with the income residual the same refugee would have if he or she moved to another municipality.

Similarly, the income function at the target municipality has the form: {y}_i^Gleft({a}^G,{N}^Gright)=gamma mathit{hboxkern0.5em {X}^G+delta mathit{hboxkern0.5em {Z}_i+{mu^G}_i, gamma mathit{hboxkern0.5em {sumG={gamma}_{l=3}^n{gamma}_l^{mathit{hbox{overset{smilel=3}{n{gamma}_l^{mathit{hboX}overset{smile }_l^G}l^G}, where X G are the same characteristics in the target municipality.

The quadratic form of the income function is highly significant for both the whole sample and the nurse household sub-sample.

While there is no published study about the shape of the marginal utility of income function in China, there is empirical evidence from India [ 55, 57] and developed countries [ 55, 58- 60] that the marginal utility of income is indeed constant.

Significant random parameters on the income functions support our random utility approach to accommodate taste heterogeneity.

In Table 4 and the following tables, the results are presented in three columns that correspond to the coefficients of the income functions of stayers (at the placement municipality), the income functions of movers (at the target municipality) and the amenity function (a combination of difference in quality of life and costs of moving).

Binmore (1994, 1998, 2005a, 2005b) has argued for many years, based on a wide range of behavioral data, that when people play games with non-relatives they tend to learn to play Nash equilibrium with respect to utility functions that approximately correspond to income functions.

Confounding variables which were adjusted for included age in 2004, gender, family income, functioning in activities of daily living (ADL) in 2004 and problem behaviours (DBC continuous score) in 2004.

Research is needed that shows which causal pathway low income functions on and what therapies in rehabilitation can mitigate the disadvantage of persons with a high level of trait anger.

The first of these differences relates to between-country VSL income elasticity, which is 2.478 for the developing country function and.693 for the high-income function; the difference is significant at p < 0.001.