'inclusive decision making' is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It can be used to describe a decision-making process that takes into account the views of all participants. For example: An important part of the project was to ensure that the team used an inclusive decision making process that included everybody's opinion.
Community functioning was by far the stronger factor and key aspects of community agency were reflected in four of community functioning's six dimensions: 1) community resilience actions such as planning and leadership, 2) collective efficacy, 3) community trust, and 4) inclusive decision making processes and citizen voice.
The need for more participative and inclusive decision making is due to the move from the technocratic nature of decision making towards more democratic processes, which is a result of the transformation of societies and situations as a result of various factors including globalisation, environmental concerns, more knowledge intensive work and lifestyle.
Centered on the basic tenet that restoration initiatives will be more successful when trust is built among stakeholders, the challenges and opportunities for community engagement are discussed, including the importance of inclusive decision making, community immersion, and fostering local leadership.
These factors include the portal's alignment with financial incentives, synergy with existing IT infrastructure and operations, physician-led governance, inclusive decision making and knowledge sharing, regional flexibility to implementation, continuous innovation, and finally, KP's emphasis on patient-centered design.
These factors include: (1) alignment with financial incentives, (2) synergy with technical and operational infrastructure, (3) physician-led governance, (4) inclusive decision making and knowledge exchange, (5) regional flexibility, (6) continuous innovation, and (7) patient-centered design.
Framing the coast as a therapeutic landscape with potential for simultaneously meeting human needs and marine needs, allows for inclusive policy decision making.
Meanwhile, representatives from CLAC-CASA and SalAMI started out across Canada and America, educating these groups in tactics, from forming human blockades to practicing inclusive consensus-based decision making.
This paper seeks to explore how knowledge co-production can help identify opportunities for building more effective, sustainable, inclusive and legitimate decision making processes on climate change.
This shows that to promote science and technology in DRR, scientists and academicians need to work closely with other stakeholders, and the ownership of the products and processes that are developed should be shared widely in order to achieve more inclusive, science-based decision making.
The study informants reported that the leadership actively continued to promote broad and inclusive participation in decision making processes and in expanding awareness about AFR related principles.
For example, the report from the High Level Independent Review Panel [ 54] noted that "all too often, CCMs only pay lip service to inclusive decision-making, and do not exercise genuine or meaningful oversight of grants in action".
