Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(6)
The TEP did not express strong unanimous support for including this item (table 2).
Future studies should investigate the added value of including this item into a prognostic tool such as ours.
As a consequence, the more stringent MI models did not converge due to multicollinearity when including this item.
298 patients consented to completing the initial questionnaire including this item set, with an additional 78 patients completing the questionnaire a second time after 4-6 weeks.
The fact that respectful encounters were most frequent and strongest associated with feeling respected is no surprise – the whole purpose of including this item was to validate the questionnaire.
Moreover, the high rate of missing values for two items, but especially for item 21- Sexual activities, raises doubts about the relevance of including this item in the questionnaire.
Similar(54)
Prior studies with SA immigrant women reported on the preference for health care providers of the same gender [1]; therefore, we decided to include this item for response by females only.
Thus, EGD tolerance did not include this item.
Therefore, we included this item in the disheartenment factor.
When using this approach, caregivers can rank each item for inclusion (e.g., most definitely include this item, include this item, possibly include this item, definitely do not include this item) as well as indicate whether or not they experience each item in their interactions with their children's physicians.
Since this case is very rare we have not included this item in Table 2.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com