included mistake

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "included mistake" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to refer to a mistake that was included in something, but it lacks clarity and proper grammatical structure. Example: "The report had an included mistake that affected the final results."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Medical errors included mistake in medication administration (too much, too little, or given to the wrong patient), incorrect medical plan (patients got the wrong plan for their illness), failure in executing an order, physicians' omitting something that should have been done or ordered doing something incorrect, and medical actions that did not produce the intended benefit for the patients.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Mr. Scheck said such causes included mistaken eyewitness identifications, false confessions and lying witnesses.

The New York Times

Typical sources of embarrassment included mistaking an overweight woman for being pregnant or a disheveled person for being a panhandler.

University of California, Berkeley

Independent agencies evaluate and compare the major credit bureaus, sometimes revealing errors and problems that have included mistaken identities, misapplied charges or debts, uncorrected errors, misleading information, and credit inconsistencies.

Encyclopedia Britannica

They included mistakes in City's Champions League defeat by Bayern Munich in October and in England's victory over Scotland at Wembley in August.

BBC

Previous theories for the cause of the influx included mistaken identity, a covert social experiment or possibly Oxfordshire's connection to Inspector Morse.

BBC

Historical markers concerning Hines' exploits have occasionally included mistaken information.

Wikipedia

Some defendants' confessions even include mistakes fed by the police.

The New York Times

A mistake will gently be corrected (including mistaken tones and classifiers).

The Economist

Investigators found that a combination of human errors caused the crash, including mistakes by the navigator.

The New York Times

Such technology can reduce medical errors, including mistakes that kill people, he said.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using "included mistake" as it's not standard English. Instead, restructure your sentence to use a more grammatically correct phrase such as "mistake included" or "error contained".

Common error

Don't use "included" passively when describing an error. It's better to say "the mistake was included" or use "contained" or "incorporated" to show how the error was part of something.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "included mistake" functions as a noun phrase where "included" acts as a past participle modifying "mistake". However, it is grammatically awkward and not recommended. Ludwig AI shows that a more appropriate construction would be "mistake included."

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Academia

33%

Science

33%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "included mistake" is grammatically incorrect and rarely used in standard English. Ludwig AI flags it as not correct in written English. While the intent is to convey an error being part of something, it's better to use alternative phrasings like "mistake included", "error contained", or restructure your sentences for clarity. Due to its awkwardness, it is best to avoid "included mistake" in formal writing. More authoritative sources tend to use clearer and more conventional phrasing when referring to errors.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

incorporated error

Focuses on the error being part of a larger whole that was deliberately constructed.

contained error

Highlights that the error was present within something else.

embedded error

Implies the error was deeply integrated or hidden within something.

error present

A more direct way of stating that an error exists within a context.

error occurred

Shifts the focus to the event of the error happening, rather than it being a component.

error was made

Similar to "error occurred", but emphasizes the action of making the mistake.

mistake happened

An even simpler way to state that a mistake took place.

mistake arose

Suggests the mistake emerged or came into being.

flaw existed

Focuses on the existence of a flaw or imperfection.

defect present

Highlights the presence of a defect or fault.

FAQs

What is a more grammatically sound way to express the idea of a mistake being part of something?

Instead of "included mistake", you can say "mistake included", "error contained", or "flaw existed" depending on the context.

How can I use "include" correctly when referring to errors?

Use "include" to list errors as part of a larger set of things. For example, "The report included several errors" is correct, whereas "included mistake" is not.

What's the difference between saying "the report included a mistake" and "the report contained a mistake"?

"The report included a mistake" lists the mistake as one of possibly many items, while "the report contained a mistake" emphasizes that the mistake was present within the report. The second option is semantically related to the expression, but more correct.

Is "included mistake" ever correct in any context?

While not standard, "included by mistake" is a correct and idiomatic phrase. However, "included mistake" should be avoided in formal writing.