Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

included from

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "included from" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It is not typically used in standard English, and its intended meaning is unclear without additional context. Example: "The data included from the previous report was not relevant to the current analysis."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Over 35s will be included from July.

News & Media

The Guardian

Honorees included, from left, Vartan Gregorian, David N.

Corrosion controlling additives should have been included from the outset.

Examples are included from both dry and wet processing environments.

In all, 202,468 participants were included from 48 countries.

There were 10 composers included, from Schoenberg to Ned Rorem.

There was also music included from the Monty Python Contractual Obligation Album.

This spared the state's officials, Arnold Schwarzenegger included, from seeing their legitimate options further whittled down.

News & Media

The New York Times

Around 70 European and American artists were included, from Carl Andre to Gilberto Zorio.

He arranged bus transportation, box lunches included, from New York to Rochester so they could testify.

News & Media

The New York Times

Ministers said just 125 vocational qualifications would be included from 2014.

News & Media

The Guardian
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Opt for clearer and more grammatically correct alternatives such as "taken from", "derived from", or "sourced from" to ensure your writing is precise and easily understood. Using these alternatives enhances clarity and credibility.

Common error

Avoid using the phrase "included from" as it is grammatically awkward. Instead, use phrases like "taken from" or "sourced from" to properly convey that something originates from a specific place or source.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "included from" typically serves as a connector indicating the origin or source of something. However, Ludwig AI suggests it is grammatically incorrect, implying a need for alternatives to fulfill this function effectively. Examples show its presence in various contexts despite its grammatical issues.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

52%

News & Media

46%

Formal & Business

2%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "included from" appears frequently across various sources, it's crucial to note, according to Ludwig AI, that it is grammatically incorrect. It is most commonly found in scientific and news-related content, aiming to specify the origin of information or materials. For clearer and more credible writing, alternatives such as "taken from", "derived from", and "sourced from" are recommended to ensure grammatical accuracy and enhance clarity. Therefore, while the phrase's usage is common, adopting more precise alternatives is advisable for effective communication.

FAQs

What are some alternatives to "included from"?

You can use alternatives such as "taken from", "derived from", or "sourced from" depending on the context.

Is "included from" grammatically correct?

According to Ludwig AI, the phrase "included from" is not considered grammatically correct. It's better to use alternatives like "taken from" or "derived from" for better clarity and grammatical accuracy.

How can I use "taken from" instead of "included from" in a sentence?

Instead of saying "The data included from the previous report was not relevant", you can say "The data taken from the previous report was not relevant".

What is the difference between "included from" and "sourced from"?

"Included from" is not a standard phrase and is considered grammatically incorrect. "Sourced from" is a grammatically sound alternative that clearly indicates the origin or provider of information or materials.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: