included back

USAGE SUMMARY

"included back" is not correct or usable in written English.
It is not a recognized phrase or idiom. If you are looking for a phrase to use in a given context, you should look for one that is more widely used. For example, you could say "The original fee was included in the purchase price" instead of "The original fee was included back in the purchase price".

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

30 human-written examples

His sculptures included "Back", a series of plaster reliefs cast in bronze.

The Economist

They happily discovered that the compensation included back wages for the days they had not worked.

The New York Times

Much has been said about how the "Harry Potter" series, in less than five years, has brought kids, boys included, back to reading.

The New York Times

The following week, on Feb. 7, 2007, Jack brought a number of Hmong leaders, Vang Pao included, back to the Thai restaurant to meet "Steve".

The New York Times - Magazine

"Nobody who looked like Barack Obama, or me, would have been included back then, but we are here today because the story of America is the story of hard fought progress," she said.

The Guardian

"It's great to be included back in the squad.

BBC

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

29 human-written examples

The score stayed 1-0 theough the second period, which included back-to-back unsuccessful Washington power plays.

The New York Times - Sports

His runs at Oregons Mount Bachelor included back-to-back 900-degree spins on the slopestyle course, a succession of varied jumps and features.

The New York Times

Harrington sat at seven under with eight holes to play before a sloppy closing stretch that included back-to-back bogeys in his last two.

The Guardian - Sport

Vigneault's seven-year tenure as coach of the Vancouver Canucks included back-to-back regular-season championships and a trip to the 2011 Stanley Cup finals.

The New York Times - Sports

Čáslavská's seven Olympic golds, won in Tokyo in 1964 and Mexico City in 1968, included back-to-back golds as best all-round gymnast, an achievement matched only once in Olympic history.

The Guardian - Sport

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for clarity, replace "included back" with more precise alternatives like "reinstated", "restored", or "added again" to ensure your writing is easily understood.

Common error

Avoid using "included back" as it often adds unnecessary complexity to sentences. Opt for simpler, direct phrasing such as "included" or "added" to maintain conciseness and clarity in your writing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "included back" attempts to function as a verb phrase, suggesting the act of re-incorporating something. However, Ludwig AI indicates that it is not considered grammatically correct in standard English. Instead, it would be better to use standard phrases like "included" or other phrases with similar meaning.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

35%

News & Media

55%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "included back" is considered grammatically incorrect and not a recognized phrase in standard English, as noted by Ludwig AI. While it appears in some contexts, particularly in news media and scientific publications, its usage is infrequent and can be improved by using alternatives. Better alternatives include "included", "added again", or "reinstated", depending on the specific context. Therefore, it is advisable to avoid "included back" in formal writing to maintain clarity and grammatical correctness.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

put back in

Suggests physically placing something back into a location or category. This alternative is very direct.

brought back in

Suggests returning something previously taken out. The semantic transformation is minimal.

added again

Emphasizes the act of adding something that was previously removed. It is a literal and direct replacement. The semantic transformation is minimal.

restored

Similar to "reinstated", this implies returning something to its original state. The transformation is moderate.

reinstated

Focuses on restoring something to a previous position or condition. The semantic transformation is stronger because it is more specific.

re-introduced

Implies making something known or available again after a period of absence. The semantic transformation is stronger because it is more specific.

re-integrated

Implies a more complex process of bringing something back into a system or group.

incorporated again

Highlights the act of combining something back into a larger whole.

comprising again

Indicates something is part of a whole once more. The transformation is moderate.

encompassed again

Suggests something is included within a larger scope or range once again. The transformation is moderate.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "included back" for clarity?

To enhance clarity, consider using alternatives such as "reinstated", "restored", or "added again" depending on the specific context.

Is "included back" grammatically correct in formal writing?

No, "included back" is generally not considered grammatically correct in formal writing. It's better to use more standard phrases like "included" or "added again".

What's a simple substitute for "included back" in a sentence?

A simple substitute could be just "included". For example, instead of "the fee was included back in the price", use "the fee was included in the price".

Which is the more common phrase, "included back" or "included"?

"Included" is significantly more common and widely accepted. Using "included back" may sound awkward or incorrect to many native English speakers.