Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(59)
Additionally, studies known from previous experience were screened and included if relevant.
We searched for studies in any settings which may include both mobile and field personnel (e.g. paramedics and community health workers) and those working in confined spaces (e.g. hospitals, mental health units, and GP surgeries) and did not restrict searches so that other high risk occupations could be included if relevant studies were found (such as transport workers and lone workers).
Non-English studies were translated and included if relevant.
The ethnicity of the individual tested should be included if relevant for the purpose of testing; this information may be useful to select the most appropriate test methods and to calculate residual risks.
The latter may include pictures, if relevant and appropriate.
Some additional items are nevertheless desirable, and review authors should include these, if relevant.
Optional items were then considered, and included if considered relevant to the setting.
Methodological articles from other fields and using other DIF methods were also included if considered relevant.
For both OPCS and ICD codes, cases were included if the relevant codes appeared in any field.
Although the greatest emphasis was placed on articles using logistic regression techniques, articles relating to any DIF methodology were included if considered relevant to the discussion of specific issues or topics.
The scenario presented to the patient should uniformly include the major clinical outcomes of the treatment decision, including death if relevant, and the time frame of the consequences of the decision.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com