Exact(4)
Available data also include assay design information, allele frequency information, raw genotypes, and analytic results including pairwise linkage disequilibrium (LD) between SNPs and phased haplotypes.
The CQAs that define the drug product QTPP typically include assay, dissolution results, stability, impurity profile, microbial burden, and physical appearance.
A detailed description of the cost analyses has been published elsewhere [ 10]. bCosts for Xpert MRSA PCR include: assay and platform costs (price GeneXpert €63,813.75), depreciation (5 years) and 8% maintenance costs, personnel costs (laboratory staff and medical microbiologist), and additional costs (Liquid Stuart's swabs, gloves, consumables).
aCosts for BD GeneOhm™ MRSA PCR (assuming 200 patients per year are screened) include: assay and platform costs (price SmartCycler €41,650), depreciation (5 years) and 8% maintenance costs, personnel costs (laboratory staff and medical microbiologist), and additional costs (Liquid Stuart's swabs, gloves, consumables).
Similar(56)
They may include assays, interventions, or manipulations--whatever techniques you used to collect relevant data.
Major applications covered include assays, impurity testing, high-throughput screening, chiral separation, pKa determination, ion analysis, impurity profiling, orthogonal method, and characterization of proteins, peptides, and nucleotides.
These include assays ranging from molecular to behavioural, and capability for chemical screening.
These include assays for genomic imbalance (by aCGH) and TP53 mutation screening [ 3, 10, 15, 16].
These include assays for several flaviviruses [ 10, 15, 16], and 16S rRNA assays [ 12] for several bacteria.
An alternative single end point screen might include assays that allow the detection of changes in insulin-regulated gene expression.
The justification for not including assay in the stability program was included in the CTAs to support the phase 2 study and no comments/queries were received.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com