Sentence examples for inclination value from inspiring English sources
The Italian dataset does not contain any other inclination value until the measurements made by Alexander von Humboldt in 1805 1806 (e.g., Cafarella et al. 1992).
We note that in Kircher (1641), the inclination value is 65°50′ on page 401, but 65°40′ on page 410.
In contrast, at posttest, the spinal inclination value increased by 12.1% (P<0.05) in the TG compared with in the CG.
The inclination values obtained from the two cores combined support the hypothesis of persistent shallow inclinations at Hawaii.
The facing inclination values for Wall 1 and Wall 2 were 6° and 15° to the vertical, respectively.
Where DSGSDs are abundant, long-lasting slope deformations effectively adjust post-glacial relief by reducing slope inclination values, and are thus expected to significantly contribute to the long-term denudation of active orogens.
Red vertical lines represent true inclination values for the four positions.
The three others are part of a group of four strictly identical inclination values (59.25°) all dated 1639 and reported by Kircher (1641) from Malta, Palermo, Messina and Napoli.
These remanence directions are shown in a specimen coordinate frame; therefore, the declination values are directly influenced by the accuracy of orienting the marker lines with a laser level, but the inclination values are determined only by the ratio of the in-plane and axial components measured with a single fluxgate sensor.
In this part of the flow, inclination values for cores AVL1 and AVL2 fluctuate within the ranges of 26.1 45.1° and 33.2 60.1°, respectively, which are large when compared to those from samples above ~70 m below the ground level, these being within the ranges of 33.4 37.1° and 34.5 51.9° for AVL1 and AVL2, respectively.
Descriptive statistics for 36-MP, 37-MP, 46-MP, 47-MP, 37 V/MD and 47 V/MD, are summarized in Table 2. Comparison of T1 molar inclination values showed no significant differences between the retention and nonretention groups (P > 0.05) (Table 2).
