The phrase "incidental questions" is correct and usable in written English.
It refers to questions that are not the main focus of a conversation or writing, but are related or secondary in nature. Example: During the press conference, the reporter asked a few incidental questions about the company's financial situation before moving onto the main topic of the new product launch.
As to the rather incidental question of why, in god's holy name, Edward Snowden is appearing on a Jean-Michel Jarre track?
States routinely deal with the incidental regulatory questions that come with these changes, and they've never before alleged that they are unconstitutional burdens. .
Incidental motions include questions arising incidentally in the consideration of other questions and decided before disposition of the one to which they are incident.
No alcohol was allowed; the house held a library and reading room; and" at meal time, and every occasion of interview, conversations [were] introduced on the various questions incidental to the elevation of man".
For Agha, Chambers's case has become almost incidental to a larger question of how athletics should tackle drugs cheats.
It reads, "For your incidental information, when we questioned the use of the designation 'Large size' in a Pepsodent commercial, we were advised that by industry agreement the large size is the smallest size distributed through retail channels".
The reason for this may be that the presuppositions in question are incidental to the primary content of these sentences.
While representationalists like Fodor, Drestke, and Jackson contend that having the right internal, representational structure is essential to having beliefs, another group of philosophers treats the internal structure of the mind as of only incidental relevance to the question of whether a being is properly described as believing.
Another possible explanation for the gaps is that studies reporting the prevalence of hypertension or obesity incidental to non-epidemiologic research questions would not have been identified, because the search terms in this review identified studies indexed as having the epidemiology of hypertension or obesity as a major focus.
Under this rule, measures cannot be included in the Senate reconciliation package if they do not have revenues or entitlement components or if such components are "merely incidental" to a broader policy question.
In addition, the results that were central to our research question were frequently incidental to the primary objectives of the studies that were reviewed, which meant that information specific to groups of patients differing in the number of prior TNF-α inhibitors used was often lacking.
