incendiary language

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "incendiary language" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe speech or writing that is likely to provoke strong emotions, particularly anger or violence. Example: "The politician's incendiary language during the debate stirred up significant controversy and backlash from the public."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

He often uses incendiary language in fighting for his causes.

The New York Times

Most of Reagan's foreign policy advisers opposed adding incendiary language.

The New York Times

Despite the sometimes incendiary language, the day passed without violence.

The New York Times

That kind of incendiary language will only invite further bloodshed.

The New York Times

And the Cruz campaign, using even more incendiary language, has called Dewhurst a "moderate".

The New Yorker

But Ms. Lavelle clearly did care about Mr. King's incendiary language.

The New York Times

Mr. Chávez apologized for his often incendiary language and promised to open talks with opponents.

The New York Times

The Chicago teachers' strike should serve as an object lesson about the dangers of incendiary language in labor negotiations.

The New York Times

The protest signs boasted such incendiary language as "God hates fags," "You're going to hell," and "God hates you".

Encyclopedia Britannica

For the most part, shocks onstage tend to come through incendiary language, provocative plot turns and chilling frights.

The New York Times

The network has even banned a guest who used incendiary language to link billionaire George Soros to the migrant caravan.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing sensitive topics, be mindful of the potential impact of using "incendiary language". Consider whether a more neutral or constructive tone would be more effective in achieving your communication goals.

Common error

Avoid using "incendiary language" when a more moderate tone would be more appropriate. Overuse can diminish the impact of your message and alienate your audience. Use it judiciously for emphasis where truly needed.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "incendiary language" functions primarily as a descriptive term. As shown by Ludwig, it is used to characterize speech or writing that is likely to provoke strong emotions, particularly anger or outrage. It's an adjective-noun combination, where the adjective "incendiary" modifies the noun "language" to specify its nature.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

96%

Encyclopedias

2%

Formal & Business

1%

Less common in

Science

0.3%

Reference

0.3%

Social Media

0.3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "incendiary language" is a commonly used and grammatically correct term that describes language intended to provoke strong emotions, especially anger. Ludwig AI confirms its acceptability and widespread usage. It's most frequently found in News & Media, where it is used to analyze and critique public discourse. When writing, it's crucial to use this phrase judiciously, as overuse can diminish its impact. Alternatives include "inflammatory rhetoric" and "provocative language". Be aware of the potential consequences of using such language and consider the context and audience.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

inflammatory rhetoric

Focuses more on the rhetorical aspect, emphasizing the persuasive and potentially misleading nature of the language.

inflammatory speech

Similar to "incendiary language" but specifically refers to spoken words.

provocative language

Highlights the intention or effect of causing a reaction, often one of anger or disagreement.

fiery rhetoric

Emphasizes the passionate and intense nature of the language used.

heated language

Suggests language charged with strong emotions, often in the context of an argument or conflict.

rabble-rousing language

Specifically implies language intended to stir up the general public, often with a negative connotation.

seditious language

Implies language that incites rebellion or resistance against established authority.

agitational rhetoric

Focuses on rhetoric that aims to create unrest or promote a particular cause through agitation.

explosive rhetoric

Highlights the sudden and forceful impact of the language.

divisive language

Emphasizes the effect of creating separation and conflict among different groups.

FAQs

What does "incendiary language" mean?

"Incendiary language" refers to speech or writing that is designed to provoke or incite strong emotions, especially anger or violence. It's language that can be seen as inflammatory or likely to cause unrest.

How can I use "incendiary language" effectively?

Use "incendiary language" sparingly and deliberately, only when the situation warrants a strong emotional response. Be aware of your audience and the potential consequences of using such language.

What are some alternatives to "incendiary language"?

You can use alternatives like "inflammatory rhetoric", "provocative language", or "fiery rhetoric" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is "incendiary language" always negative?

While often associated with negative contexts like political disputes or conflicts, "incendiary language" can sometimes be used to galvanize support for a cause or to highlight injustices, though it always carries the risk of unintended consequences.