Sentence examples for inappropriate submissions from inspiring English sources

On the Tumblr blog "Shitty New Yorker Cartoon Captions," two guys craft wrong-headed, vulgar, and hilariously inappropriate submissions to the weekly contest.

It says the practice of Libor rate-rigging was "widespread", with "at least 219 requests for inappropriate submissions were documented – an unquantifiable number of oral requests, which by their nature would not be documented, were also made.

He argues that they encourage gaming that can bias journals against publishing certain types of papers; waste time by overloading some journals with inappropriate submissions; and encourage "me-too" science in favour of more risky, potentially groundbreaking work.

At UBS at least 2,000 requests for "inappropriate submissions" to the key rates were documented and at least 45 individuals "including traders, managers and senior managers were involved in, or aware of, the practice of attempting to influence submissions", the FSA said.

"At least 2,000 requests for inappropriate submissions were documented - an unquantifiable number of oral requests, which by their nature would not be documented, were also made," the FSA said.

And it wastes the time of scientists by overloading highly cited journals such as Science with inappropriate submissions from researchers who are desperate to gain points from their evaluators.‡.

In 2003 and later, if an author selected an inappropriate submission type (i.e., "controlled clinical trial" instead of "survey"), the abstract lost points on Methods, but the loss was reflected consistently across reviewers and could not be attributed to bias on the part of reviewers.

From March 2 to April 9, 2002, samples were collected from 505 deer; however, 29 deer were not included in the analysis because of sample autolysis, inappropriate tissue submission, or lack of availability of appropriate tissues (e.g., deer with no intact cranium or those shot in the head).

In response to complaints during its first week that finding games to support was made difficult by a flood of inappropriate or false submissions, Valve required developers to pay to list a game on the service to reduce illegitimate submissions.

Except for some rudimentary screening for inappropriate off-topic submissions, almost anyone can post almost anything.

Notably, in N. pulcher −F fish showed fewer of those behaviours classified as appropriate in a given context, but they did not show more of those behaviours classified as inappropriate (e.g. submission by winners of a resource or aggression towards dominant pair members).