Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "inappropriate by" is not grammatically correct or commonly used in written English
It is unclear what the intended meaning of this phrase is. Depending on the context, there may be alternative phrases that could be used. For example, if referring to something that is unsuitable or not fitting for a particular situation, one could say "inappropriate for" or "not appropriate for." If referring to something that is offensive or not socially acceptable, one could say "considered inappropriate by" or "deemed inappropriate by."
Exact(58)
Your avatar has been deemed inappropriate by our moderators.
A Yorkshire Ripper trail would be seen as highly inappropriate by most people.
He added: "Using the name of God in an irrelevant and distasteful manner would be considered inappropriate by any religion".
Another lesson learned from Sept. 11 was how quickly consumer sensitivities can shift over the tone of ads, particularly those suddenly rendered inappropriate by serious events.
Although my books have been deemed "anti-authoritarian" and "inappropriate" by some, I've heard from parents, teachers, and kids alike that they've helped turn non-readers into readers.
YouTube's policy is to review videos that are flagged as inappropriate by users or as unlawful by a government or court.
He went on to argue that using the name of God in an "irrelevant and distasteful manner" would be deemed inappropriate by any religion, not just Islam.
In November 2007, YouTube removed videos flagged as "inappropriate" by a community member that showed a person in Egypt being tortured by the police.
This is not inappropriate, by the way: the sole purpose of the BMA – which it does not disguise – is to further the interests of doctors.
The UK Government's decision to lower flags on public buildings in his honour was criticised as excessive and inappropriate by some MPs.
Any site derived from Facebook, YouTube, or eBay is "deemed inappropriate by your line manager" and cannot be accessed, not even to revise a practical procedure with a YouTube demonstration.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com