Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
When predicting the promoter usage level we observe roughly the same marks being important as in the active versus inactive classification, with a few interesting differences.
Comparison of the actives/true inactives classification efficiency for beta-2 homology models constructed on activated and deactivated M2R template.
IP-10 plasma levels were compared between LS and healthy controls, as well as within LS between active and inactive disease (activity classification based on clinical parameters).
It attained significantly less precise classifications of inactive promoters vs. random genomic locations (AUC 0.795 and P < 10^-16 10^-16
Here, active clusters are those whose centroids are relevant to classification, and inactive ones are not.
As expected, H3K4me2, H3K4me3 and H3K9ac signals have the largest importance on classification of inactive vs. active promoters, especially H3K4me2.
The rationale for this approach to selecting (a subset of) inactive compounds for the classification modeling is that it is more challenging to establish robust models when the two classes of active and inactive compounds include relatively similar molecules.
In contrast to NBH-based prediction of numerical potency values, the conditional probability method can utilize approximate potency measurements (e.g., primary screening data) leading to a binary classification of inactive vs. active data set compounds and ensuing prediction of a probability of activity for VCs.
In this study, the influence of the way of forming the set of inactives on the classification process was examined: random and diverse selection from the ZINC database, MDDR database and libraries generated according to the DUD methodology.
Higher DAS28 values are indicative of greater disease activity with significance placed on the threshold values of DAS28 < 2.6, 2.6 ≤ DAS28 ≤ 3.2, 3.2 < DAS28 ≤ 5.1, and DAS28 > 5.1, corresponding to the classifications of remission, inactive RA, moderate RA and very active RA, respectively.
He still defies classification.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com