inaccuracies of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "inaccuracies of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing errors, mistakes, or discrepancies related to a specific subject or context. Example: "The report highlighted the inaccuracies of the data collected during the survey."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

But Chaplin was so appalled by the inaccuracies of his portrait that he sued her.

The New Yorker

There's something dreary about pointing out the historical inaccuracies of a period drama.

The New Yorker

However, caution has been urged following the inaccuracies of polls during the general election.

The Guardian

As an editor, Thurber was meticulous; mistakes of grammar or inaccuracies of fact infuriated him.

The Guardian - Books

By Elizabeth Minkel August 24, 2011 There's something dreary about pointing out the historical inaccuracies of a period drama.

The New Yorker

"We acknowledge the inaccuracies of the report and deeply regret the mistake," Stephan Pechdimaldji, a spokesman for The Times, wrote in an e-mail message.

The New York Times - Sports

One proposed rule, for instance, would require executives to certify financial statements but is silent about the consequences of inaccuracies of the statements.

The New York Times

But Sharp berated Neal over the perceived inaccuracies of their "hoydenish", boisterous dancing, while she in turn accused him of pedantry.

The Guardian - Music

She imagines him quietly retired to a villa near Sydenham Park, excited, not embarrassed, as a flurry of fossil discoveries point up the inaccuracies of his monumental creations.

The New York Times - Books

The problem for Hillary is that three percentage points just isn't good enough, especially when you take into account the inaccuracies of polling.

The Guardian

Residual inaccuracies of the calibration lead to biased SUV values.

EJNMMI Research

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing the limitations of a study or model, use "inaccuracies of" to specifically address the sources of error or bias present in the data or methodology.

Common error

Avoid using "inaccuracies of" when referring to outright falsehoods or deliberate misrepresentations. Use it to address unintended or inherent limitations rather than intentional deception.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "inaccuracies of" functions as a noun phrase, specifying the existence of errors or imprecisions related to a particular subject or entity. Ludwig's examples showcase its use in identifying limitations in various contexts, such as data collection, GPS locations, or self-reported data.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

55%

News & Media

43%

Formal & Business

1%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "inaccuracies of" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression to denote errors or imprecisions within a particular context. As highlighted by Ludwig, its primary function is to identify and acknowledge limitations in various domains, ranging from scientific research to news reporting. With a neutral to formal register, "inaccuracies of" is commonly found in academic, scientific, and journalistic sources. When aiming for clarity and precision, remember that "inaccuracies of" is best used to address unintended limitations rather than deliberate falsehoods. Alternatives like "errors in" or "mistakes in" can be considered based on the specific context and desired level of formality. Therefore, leveraging the power of "inaccuracies of" in your writing can help you convey accurate meanings to your readers.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

errors in

Focuses specifically on mistakes within something.

mistakes in

Similar to "errors in", but may imply less severe deviations.

faults in

Highlights flaws or defects in something.

imprecisions in

Emphasizes a lack of exactness or precision.

discrepancies in

Indicates inconsistencies or disagreements.

inconsistencies in

Similar to discrepancies, but may refer to logical contradictions.

untrustworthiness of

Focuses on the reliability of something

fallacies in

Indicates logical errors or misleading arguments.

unreliability of

Highlights lack of dependability or trustworthiness.

erroneous nature of

Focuses on the incorrect or false quality of something.

FAQs

How can I use "inaccuracies of" in a sentence?

You can use "inaccuracies of" to point out flaws or errors within a particular system, report, or method. For example: "The report highlighted the "inaccuracies of" the data collection process."

What are some alternatives to "inaccuracies of"?

Some alternatives include "errors in", "mistakes in", or "discrepancies in" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

When is it appropriate to use "inaccuracies of" versus "errors in"?

"Inaccuracies of" often refers to a range of slight deviations or imprecisions, while "errors in" might imply more significant or clear-cut mistakes. Choose the term that best reflects the scale and nature of the problem.

Can "inaccuracies of" be used in both formal and informal contexts?

Yes, "inaccuracies of" is suitable for both formal and informal writing, although it's more commonly found in formal contexts such as academic papers or reports. In more casual settings, phrases like "mistakes in" might be preferred.