Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
"in-depth feedback" is correct and commonly used in written English.
It refers to detailed and thorough feedback or criticism. Example: "After submitting my essay, I received in-depth feedback from my professor, highlighting both the strengths and areas for improvement in my writing."
Exact(15)
As part of this ongoing evaluation process we sought in-depth feedback from the first graduates about their student experiences.
Working in a close-knit class of just six people, you'll receive in-depth feedback about every element of your novel.
We measured the effectiveness of the program via mixed methods consisting of qualitative interviews providing in-depth feedback and quantitative analysis demonstrating statistically significant benefit.
TCP instructors provide in-depth feedback on all types of documents (e.g., fellowship and grant proposals, journal articles, job search documents) and presentations (e.g., dissertation defenses, pitches) and have extensive experience in working with technical and scientific (STEM) topics.
At your exit interview, you can expect in-depth feedback about your teaching portfolio, which we hope will help you think more deeply about your teaching, develop your teaching statement for the job market, and improve your syllabi for your future courses.
Sweat also comes with nutritional guides and syncs up to your Apple Watch to give you in-depth feedback on your workouts.
Similar(45)
It's so wonderful (and rare!) that professors and TAs take the time to give such in-depth individual feedback.
If you've completed the first draft of your novel, Tim will provide in-depth personalised feedback on your manuscript (up to 80,000 words) and advice, should it be ready, on how to get it into print.
The first step to getting actionable, in-depth market feedback is defining who the market is.
More in-depth qualitative feedback would help understand whether this is the case.
We used mixed methods to explore and capture in-depth qualitative feedback and quantitative measures to further confirm validation of tool content which strengthened the rigour of this methodological process.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com