in-depth debate

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "in-depth debate" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a thorough and detailed discussion on a particular topic or issue. Example: "The conference featured an in-depth debate on climate change policies, allowing experts to share their insights and perspectives."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

6 human-written examples

Bush was intolerant of confrontations and in-depth debate.

The New York Times - Books

In fairness, the producers are in an impossible position, forced to cater to a huge range of tastes, from those who simply want to see goals, to those who want detailed, in-depth debate about offside traps and overlapping full-backs.

The Guardian - Sport

Other items on the agenda for this week's meeting include proposals for mandatory requirements for ships above 5,000 tonnes in weight to record and report on their fuel consumption, and the establishment of a working group for an "in-depth debate" on how to further reduce greenhouse gas emissions from ships.

The Guardian

Mark Chapman brings you an in-depth debate about how football could tackle fan disorder.

BBC

The fact this genre always seems to either evoke extreme reactions in people or take people into an in-depth debate, I think is a super thing in itself!

Huffington Post

At the same time, opportunities for more in-depth debate among IRB members in Botswana regarding areas of concern to the constituencies they protect would help to tailor both future IRB-member training and public health outreach.

BMC Medical Ethics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

LH An Australian and an American living in the UK have in-depth debates and banter that is actually amusing.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

Goodlatte is actually optimistic about political media, in part because the Internet allows more sophisticated and in-depth debates than the soundbite cycle of 24-hour Cable news.

TechCrunch

Goodlatte is actually optimistic about political media, in part because the Internet allows more sophisticated and in-depth debates than the soundbite cycle of 24-hour Cable news.

TechCrunch

"We now have to take the time for in-depth debates about what worries the French, who expect strong and precise answers," he said, citing Europe, unemployment, security and identity issues.

Vice

"The lively, in-depth debates at the J7 Youth Summit demonstrate that we need to join forces with the younger generation to do more to ensure more equitable and sustainable development".

Unicef

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing about complex topics, plan for an "in-depth debate" by allocating sufficient time for research, discussion, and critical analysis to facilitate a more informed and nuanced outcome.

Common error

Avoid using "in-depth debate" when a simple discussion would suffice. Reserve this phrase for situations where a thorough and detailed examination of opposing viewpoints is genuinely necessary. Otherwise, it can sound pretentious or exaggerate the situation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "in-depth debate" functions as a noun phrase, where "in-depth" acts as a compound adjective modifying the noun "debate". As Ludwig AI confirms, it describes a discussion that is thorough and detailed, indicating a significant level of scrutiny and analysis.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

41%

Science

33%

Formal & Business

26%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "in-depth debate" is a grammatically sound and useful phrase for describing a thorough and detailed discussion. Ludwig AI confirms that it is suitable for various contexts, particularly in news, science, and formal business settings. While synonyms like "thorough discussion" or "detailed analysis" exist, "in-depth debate" uniquely combines the elements of depth and active discussion. While frequently used, it's crucial to employ the phrase judiciously, reserving it for situations where a comprehensive examination of opposing viewpoints is warranted.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

thorough discussion

Emphasizes completeness and attention to detail, omitting the intensity implied by "in-depth".

detailed discussion

Focuses on the level of detail covered, lacking the sense of argumentation inherent in "debate".

extensive deliberation

Highlights a careful and lengthy consideration, shifting the focus from active discussion to reflective thought.

comprehensive dialogue

Stresses inclusivity and broad coverage, losing the specific element of opposing viewpoints in "debate".

intensive discussion

Highlights the focused and concentrated nature of the discussion, similar to "in-depth", but less formal.

profound exchange

Suggests a deep and meaningful conversation, potentially lacking the structured or argumentative aspect of a "debate".

rigorous examination

Implies a strict and methodical analysis, omitting the interactive element of a "debate".

serious consideration

Emphasizes the importance and gravity of the topic being discussed, differing from a formal debate setting.

substantial analysis

Focuses on the quality and quantity of analysis, whereas a debate is more interactive.

critical assessment

Highlights evaluation and judgment, moving away from the open exchange of ideas in a "debate".

FAQs

How can I use "in-depth debate" in a sentence?

You can use "in-depth debate" to describe a thorough and detailed discussion on a particular topic. For example, "The committee engaged in an "in-depth debate" about the proposed policy changes."

What's a good synonym for "in-depth debate"?

Alternatives to "in-depth debate" include "thorough discussion", "detailed discussion", or "comprehensive dialogue", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is "in depth debate" one word or two?

"In-depth debate" is correctly written with a hyphen, as "in-depth" functions as a compound adjective modifying "debate".

What is the difference between an "in-depth debate" and a regular debate?

An "in-depth debate" suggests a more thorough and detailed examination of the issues compared to a standard debate. It implies a deeper level of analysis and consideration of various perspectives.