Keith, a quick question about the scope of the belief/acceptance distinction you endorse, in light of your last comment.
"I just have to tell you, your last comment, I am really in shock," said Lukey in response.
"The buildings are all different heights". "The buildings are not perfectly aligned — they look squished in". This last comment lead to a discussion of why Roman emperors would prefer to build in the congested urban center rather than on airy tracts in the suburbs.
Attached in response for the last comment of Referee 2.
If there was a hint of self-satisfaction in that last comment, Johnson deserves it.
Horrific grammar in my last comment.
Strategic planning and the system connectivity in the last comment relate to a long-term perspective and in some sense to the evaluation criterion of sustainability.
As we mentioned above in our response to Reviewer 1, this opinion, as well as the one appeared in the last comment of Reviewer 1, implies that the circular RNA chromosome may have been short.
In his last comment, reviewer 3 was rather asking how VASP can promote vectorial growth specifically, i.e. how does VASP elongate only or preferentially filaments pointing towards the cell center.
If not, could a similar quantification be provided for Figure 3? In his last comment, reviewer 3 was rather asking how VASP can promote vectorial growth specifically, i.e. how does VASP elongate only or preferentially filaments pointing towards the cell center.
Oh, there are bleats and protestations from parent-like people here and there in the comments, but nothing comes close to the absolute conviction displayed in the arrogance of that last comment.
