Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(10)
The specificity of your message will determine the level of detail you want to include in your figure.
So in your Figure 6, either the left-hand species, as you suggest, or the middle species could be the ancestral state.
Thus, you are indeed correct that there appears to be evidence for an h-site in your figure 5 (of ref [ 20]) data.
The apparent formation of (E -ß-farnesene micE -ß-farnesene in your FigurE -ß-farneseneur attention, perhaps because this phenomicelleas never been examined and explained in detail.
If I remove the three datapoints with [ATP] = 5 mM, 7 mM and 10 mM, i.e. values higher than those in your figure 1 data, similar results are obtained.
One interesting point of agreement is that the five most frequent amino acids in our list (Gly, Ala, Asp, Glu, Val) are exactly those coded by GNN codons, and this suggests something very similar to that shown in your Figure 3.
Similar(50)
Don't use lots of colour in your figures — it will distract from the data.
There's a trend in your figures, but you have no evidence of a secular trend.
Although a tax inspection is often triggered by a discrepancy in your figures, they can also be carried out completely at random.
Could you add more detail such as the whether, in your figures, you include the ceremonies?
So ask yourself whether, after grasping the results presented in your figures, the reader will be led to the correct overall conclusion.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com