Sentence examples for in which premises from inspiring English sources

Part of this involves introducing a 'super' planning use class in which premises that residents believe have a negative impact can be controlled".

Together, this star-crossed pair must venture into the void, attempting to converse with creatures who are seen through a glass darkly,and who communicate via inky circles, what Chiang calls "mandalas... in which premises and conclusions were interchangeable".

∴ Some Z's are X's. is not a valid inference form, for, although instances of it can be produced in which premises and conclusion are all true, instances of it can also be produced in which the premises are true but the conclusion is false e.g., 5) Every dog is a mammal.

In yet other examples, the order in which premises are used is important and an argument from A, B to C is to be distinguished from an argument from B, A to C. (For more details, consult the entry on substructural logics).

However, Aristotle states his results not by saying that certain premise-conclusion combinations are invalid but by saying that certain premise pairs do not "syllogize": that is, that, given the pair in question, examples can be constructed in which premises of that form are true and a conclusion of any of the four possible forms is false.

All these differences are statistically significant.> -wrap-foot> The GP runs a private practice in which premises, equipment, and/or staff are hired from the municipality.

We can categorize philosophers' positions negatively in terms of which premises of the noncognitivist argument they accept or reject.[14] Some have rejected premise 1, often going on to defend forms of naturalist moral realism that embrace externalism (e.g. Railton 1986; Brink 1989).

Given that, in the largest CTS Link that they identified, the majority of premises were in Scotland [ 20], knowing which premises are linked to one another will likely considerably affect the contact structures of the networks, when scaling up to the national level.

The unspoken assumption in this case is that the premises contain all the relevant information; exceptional circumstances, in which the premises may be true in an unexpected way that allows the conclusion to be false, are ruled out.

Put in positive terms: in any model in which the premises are true (or in any interpretation of the premises according to which they are true), the conclusion is true too.

(1) Formal fallaciousness is simply the case where the conclusion does not follow validly from the premises; this type of error can be demonstrated by producing a suitable analogous counter-example in which the premises are true and the conclusion is false.